I totally forgot about those. How things change :-P
Shai
On 12/3/2010 7:12 AM, Michael Biel wrote:
> Tim's message and Steve's reply came thru fine in the non-digest form.
> Maybe this is the replacement for those rejection messages we used to
> get. It's always something.
>
> Mike Biel [log in to unmask]
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Why are ARSCList messages garbled?
> From: Steven Smolian<[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Thu, December 02, 2010 10:45 pm
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
> So it's HTML. I always thought it was comic book thought baloon cursing
> of
> the digital age.
>
> Hope this finds you *!@## ing well.
>
> Steve
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Tim Brooks
> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 10:09 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [ARSCLIST] Why are ARSCList messages garbled?
>
> Does anyone know why my ARSCList messages (in Digest form) - and only
> ARSCList messages - have been coming through loaded with HTML code?
> Things
> like<BR>, ,<a href=, etc. Makes them very hard to read. This
> started
> about a month ago and seems to only affect ARSCList. Other digests I
> get,
> such as 78-L, are usually clean. Has anyone else had this problem?
>
> It will be interesting to see how this message comes through.
>
|