Here's what I wrote. Did anyone see this? I don't believe I did.

re: Rach 2 performance by Composer on LP

But first the rejection notice. This is a new one for me.

Your message is being returned to you unprocessed because it appears
to have
already been distributed to the ARSCLIST list. That is, a
message with
identical text (but possibly with different mail headers) has been
posted to
the list recently, either by you or by someone else. If you have
reason to
resend this message to the list (for instance because you have been
notified of
a hardware failure with loss of data), please alter the text of the
message in
some way and resend it to the list. Note that altering the "Subject:"
line or
adding blank lines at the top or bottom of the message is not
sufficient; you
should instead add a sentence or two at the top explaining why
you are
resending the message, so that the other subscribers understand why
they are
getting two copies of the same message.

------what I wanted to say -----------

So is LCT-1014 the same or not as LM-6123? (first complete reissue in a
set of the 4 Concerto and Paganini Rhapsody).

(This was a Christmas present that I begged for. When I opened the
package, which was obviously records, I was greeted by a recording of
Bach Organ Music! My mother had found one on the Somerset label or some
cheapie groc store label and included that on the top to throw me off
and surprise me, which she did!)

I didn't own LCT-1014, but there was a public library copy that I heard
a long time ago. I never compared the two. I didn't realize all this
about the alt takes until I heard the complete LP reissue, which is
different from LM-6123, (and by then the library's copy of 1014 was long
gone). Or some sides are different. I have never done a detailed
comparison. I remember my astonishment at first hearing of the little
slip towards the end of the third movement.

joe salerno