I think the reason why you haven't heard a thing about 176 is because
(as far as I know) it has never given anyone any trouble. I transferred
many of these tapes for the Israeli broadcasting Authority and all
played like new. Believe it or else, they used them during the 70's as
master tapes for everything, including classical and pop music. The
recordings were made on Ampex 351 and 440 recorders and some of them are
fantastic. Never had a problem.
On 12/23/2010 5:00 PM, Lou Judson wrote:
> Well, you asked for "any comments" ...
> I worked with a nonprofit radio interview group and we tried one batch
> of DAK tape - the quality was so bad we threw it out right away. Then
> we settled on buying "Shamrock" 7" reels of substandard, factory
> reject Ampex at $1 each in boxes of 50, and spent time sorting
> backcoated from non coated, splicing them into 10" pancakes, and so on
> - within ten years 90% of it turned sticky, forcing me to learn baking
> techniques long before I knew anyone else using it... So we might have
> been better off with the DAK!
> Later we switched to 3M 176 (duplication grade) for our masters (!)
> and while not premium, all the 176 still plays faultlessly. I never
> seem to hear abotu 176 and 177 here but it never shed or got SSS. 176
> is like a newer 111, which also always plays when I get it in... if it
> doesn't break!
> On Dec 22, 2010, at 6:19 PM, Dan Nelson wrote:
> For many years (60s-70s) i worked with DAK( the catalogue electronic
> guru) and
> we re-slit 10's of 1000's of reels of computer and instrumentation
> tape from 3M,
> Ampex (main frame computer tape) Sound craft (brown oxide).
> Having access to all this stock i was always bringing rough winds or
> reels home....... to which i still have an outside storage shed full
> of 7/10"
> x1/4 and 10x1/2 inch tape. Stored with out regard for heat and cold.
> I pulled some of this stock since this sss discussion and the 3M
> stock from the 60-70 doesnt seem to show any sss. The same goes for
> Ampex 1/2"
> computer even the backcoated.
> I would think that the binder would be the same for
> audio/computer/instrumentation/video tape coating lines would be the
> ....... it would be the oxide formulation or grain orientation that
> would be
> Any comments ?