LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  December 2010

ARSCLIST December 2010

Subject:

Re: Suggestions Toward Nomenclature of Digital Media Files

From:

David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 30 Dec 2010 17:16:03 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (114 lines)

Thank you Ronda, for addressing several of the many knotty questions
relating to digital domain sources. Below I just wanted to summarize,
hopefully briefly, some of the issues I'm facing.

This concerns documentation of digital files of my own recordings. I keep a
running list of the things I work on as a composer/recording artist. Some
may feel this the apogee of egoism, but hear me out. As I have edited for
All Music many of the worklists of major composers, I have grown to believe
that it is the responsibility of composers to maintain their own worklists.
To not do so is irresponsible; I'm not sure what we would do if major
composers like Haydn, Mozart and CPE Bach hadn't kept their own lists. A
good example of what may happen when a very prolific composer does not is
the case of Georg Philipp Telemann, whose system of nomenclature is a
disaster and almost totally useless. I'm not concerned with whether anyone
finds my work significant, just that if anyone ever does and I'm no longer
around that there is some kind of tool to use for it.

I work primarily in three areas; (a) rock songs with or without lyrics and
the usual guitar/bass/drums combination,  (b) electronic works, encompassing
pieces made with records or tape and (c) conventionally notated music in the
form of music manuscripts or scores made with the aid of programs like
Finale, Noteworthy etc. My list, which I started in 1991, is organized into
four sections: (a) the main worklist, of completed, published or performed
works, now running to 542 numbers, (b) Anh. 1, of unfinished, lost or
abandoned works, now running to 271 numbers, (c) Anh. 2, Non-original works
which I have performed, arranged or contributed to; up to 78 numbers and (d)
BI, the "black index" of works I don't want distributed for any reason,
which for now sits at only one number.

In June I experienced a disaster that caused me to lose many to most of my
primary source recordings, to the extent that I now don't know what I have.
I had to modify my list for each entry to include the following headings:

STATUS - LYRIC SHEET - SCORE - Q - FILE

"Q" refers to an original source recording, whatever that is. "File" refers
to digital sources of same, and the problem I'm having is in distinguishing
the various files relating to a work, especially as in most cases the Qs are
now gone and I'm recovering file versions from emails sent, online storage,
copies made by friends and other places where I have squirrelled works away.

In the case of UD 542, "For Dan," this was a piece recorded on a digital
device I once had on my computer that was like a patchcord moog synthesizer
which you could play with your mouse. I was not satisfied with it at the
time, and the takes I made for the project vanished with a major system
crash I experienced when it was only a few months old. At the time I did it,
I made this entry into Anhang 1:

Anh1 212. For Dan 1-5 (a-e) 20071001 conserved, not distributed

This provides the recording date of 10-1-2007 and that five takes were made;
none passed. This indicates that I would have lettered the takes "a thru e."

Just yesterday I came upon a removable media disc that I recognized as a
computer backup that I thought had failed; in fact, my tech told me at the
time that it was no good. But I plugged it in and discovered that the drive
was partly accessible. Among the contents were some of the takes of "For
Dan" in the form of FLAC files. I decided to try and finish the piece in
some way as a way of answering my good fortune in recovering it, and
converted all of the FLACs back into wav files. But they didn't come to me
quite in the form I thought:

For Dan 1
For Dan 2
For Dan 3
For Dan 22
For Dan ses

1-3 and 2-22 are related thematically; "ses" would have been a Cool Edit
multitrack version of the piece which I cannot open as I do not have
CoolEdit at the moment. So I assume that I tried to name take "4" take "2"
by mistake, but instead of renaming it "4" I named it "22." The "ses" file
must have been the "e" indicated in the list entry, but if there was a
two-track version made there was no sign of it on the removable media.

In the end I went into Audacity and set up a multitrack version where the
four sources appear in successive order, however I overlaid 22 with part of
2 in order to create a kind of double canon between the slow chords in each
track. With the submix I decided to slow the whole piece down to 82 percent,
because the nervous tempo of the original was something that had always
bothered me; I also added some reverb. In making an mp3 to send around, I
discovered that the high quality mp3 I'd made was too big at 32MB to post in
my box.net account, so I made a lower quality version to post.

This adds up to a lot of files:

Audacity files for all four original elements
UD - For Dan.aud (multitrack)
UD - For Dan.wav
UD - For Dan.mp3
UD - For Dan lo fi.mp3

So altogether, 15 files for this project, including one that I can't access;
the changed speed and reverb information isn't encountered until For
Dan.wav. So I am faced with filling in my entry in the main catalogue:

543. For Dan 20101229 [<Anh1 212]
STATUS Posted
LYRIC SHEET Instrumental
SCORE Electronic
Q UD - For Dan.wav
FILE

In the past I have typically "retired" numbers in Anh 1 when the piece has
moved to a "finished" status, but in this case I have decided to keep it in
order to affix the older files to that entry. Nevertheless, it sure would be
easier if I had some consistent way to enter the sources numerically, as I
do for tapes, issue numbers of records etc.

Thanks for reading this far.

Uncle Dave Lewis
Lebanon, OH

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager