LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  December 2010

ARSCLIST December 2010

Subject:

Re: Cleaning Vinyl Records

From:

Corey Bailey <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 6 Dec 2010 11:00:44 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (129 lines)

Hi Julie,

This is from the LOC website:
http://www.loc.gov/preserv/care/record.html


Cheers!

Corey
Corey Bailey Audio Engineering


At 09:25 AM 12/6/2010, you wrote:
>Thanks, Tom! I really appreciate your suggestions. This is an 
>archival collection, so like most archival collections, it would not 
>circulate beyond our reading room.
>
>I would really love to get some input from archivists on the list, too.
>
>Julie
>
>________________________________________
>From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List 
>[[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Tom Fine [[log in to unmask]]
>Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 5:48 AM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Cleaning Vinyl Records
>
>Hi Julie:
>
>One man's opinions here, but a man with a lot of records ...
>
>1. As for cleaning, YES, do so, before playing any of them, and do 
>not circulate them (ie let
>"common folks" play them). Spring for CD versions of the material, 
>if it's in print, to circulate.
>Figure out some way to make the rest of it available in-house only. 
>So, for a cleaning system for a
>small collection, I really like the SpinClean:
>http://tinyurl.com/24yvewn
>
>Why? Because it's easy to use and doesn't cost a fortune. Perfect 
>for a small collection and nothing
>exotic, strange or sophisticated to learn.
>
>2. As for the sleeves, just wipe them off with a clean cloth. If 
>there's mold, there's not much you
>can do about it except keep them dry and keep the moldy ones 
>isolated from the rest by keeping all
>of them in plastic jacket-cover sleeves.
>
>3. After cleaning the records, I recommend you replace the inner 
>sleeves. I like Sleeve City because
>it tends to be a little less costly:
>http://sleevetown.com/
>but Bags Unlimited makes fine products too:
>http://www.bagsunlimited.com
>I like the "rice paper" plastic kind. The cheapo paper ones I don't 
>recommend. The heavy paper ones
>I really don't recommend for LPs as it's very easy to do some 
>serious scratching just putting the LP
>into the sleeves.
>
>4. From either of those sources, also get plastic jacket covers. 
>That isolates whatever is going on
>with one jacket from the surrounding jackets (besides mold, some 
>jackets are made of more or less
>acidic cardboard than others, so some brown out over time while 
>others don't). Some on this list
>will say, store the inner sleeved record outside the jacket within 
>the plastic sleeve (so as not to
>put any warping edge-stress on the record). That's good advice, 
>although my experience is that most
>records fit in most jackets with room to spare if you take the time 
>to slide the inner sleeves in
>carefully.
>
>5. For storing the records, both Sleeve City and Bags Unlimited sell 
>archival LP storage boxes. I've
>had good luck with Bags' plastic-ized corrogated boxes, but beware 
>SHARP edges!
>
>Records are really neat artifacts, but they fall right apart if 
>handled by unskilled hands. Public
>use is a non-starter since probably everything you got is out of 
>print and there's some degree of
>cost and effort to replacing it. There was a whole business model 
>back in the day built around the
>fact that people wore out records, from both rough handling and 
>junky playback equipment. One
>argument made for the higher cost of CD's was that they wouldn't 
>wear out, which of course is not
>true since they can get scratched or finger-printed to the point of 
>non-playability. I advise
>archive clients not to circulate any out of print CDs, rather use 
>CDR copies for in-house-only
>listening. This would be much less of an issue if the commercial 
>music business were healthy and
>most CD titles were readily available and in-print, but that's not 
>the case anymore.
>
>-- Tom Fine
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Grob, Julie" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2010 6:22 PM
>Subject: [ARSCLIST] Cleaning Vinyl Records
>
>
>Hi audio experts,
>
>I have acquired a small collection of vinyl records from the 1980s 
>and 1990s for our archive. What
>is the best low-tech way to clean the covers and the records 
>themselves? They are quite dusty...
>stored in a garage.
>
>Sincerely,
>Julie Grob
>
>Julie Grob
>Digital Projects & Instruction Librarian
>Special Collections
>114 University Libraries
>Houston, TX 77204-2000
>Ph: 713-743-9744
>Fax: 713-743-9893

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager