On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 17:57:56 -0500, Denenberg, Ray wrote
> (See also related posting "multiple dates".)
> On the issue of what does '196x' mean - does it mean "all of the
> discrete years 1960 through 1969", as I proposed, or should it mean,
> as Ed proposes, the continuous interval, and thus the decade, the 1960s?
Actually... I suggested that 196x is 1960s as a decade with the precision
> I don't see too much harm in Ed's proposal, "continuous interval".
A "continuous interval" covering a unit X in precision X is nothing more
than, I'd suggest, a discrete date with a precision of X.
> And, from looking at recent discussion, my impression is that
> nobody (besides Ed) cares much about the issue.
I'm not sure.. Even if people don't quite grasp why I still would suggest
there is nothing to loose by decoupling precision and accuracy--- as we
do in all scientific measurements.
> I do see a the following issues, though.
> first, it would follow that 19xx means 20th century. Or actually no,
> I suppose it wouldn't really, since a century is defined to begin at
> year 1 - the 20th century begins with year 1901. (This is as opposed
> to the definition of a decade - a decade begins with a year ending
> in 0.) The point I'm getting to is that there already is a syntax
> for century prescribed in ISO 8601: '19' means 20th centtury (there
> is no corresponding similar syntax for decade). So, we would need
Correct. ISO 8601 has a large number of implicit precisions. 19 means
20th century, 1982 is in year precision, 1982-12 is in month precision,
1882-W12 is in week precision, 1981-12-12 is in day precision..
> to be very careful about all this. 196x would mean the decade of the
> 1960s. 19xx would mean the interval 1900 through 1999 but it would
> not mean the 20th century. Perhaps this really isn't a problem at
> all, just a cautionary note.
> Second, we would then have three (!) syntaxes for an interval (for a
> decade, for example). The 1960s would be (1) 1960/1969 (2) 1960-
> -1960 (3) 196x.
1) 1960/1969 is an interval with precision of year.
2) I'm not sure what it is
3) Its, I've suggested, the decade of the 1960s with the precision of decade--
the missing link.
19xx and 19 are, I think, semantically equivalent.
> Third, there is a possible utility in allowing the x notation for
> multiple dates, but see related posting "multiple dates".
> Thoughts, please.
Edward C. Zimmermann, NONMONOTONIC LAB
Basis Systeme netzwerk, Munich Ges. des buergerl. Rechts
Office Leo (R&D):
Leopoldstrasse 53-55, D-80802 Munich,
Federal Republic of Germany