LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for PCCLIST Archives


PCCLIST Archives

PCCLIST Archives


[email protected]


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PCCLIST Home

PCCLIST Home

PCCLIST  December 2010

PCCLIST December 2010

Subject:

Re: Policy Committee meeting outcomes (Clarification on Decision 2)

From:

"Lasater, Mary Charles" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Program for Cooperative Cataloging <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:12:47 -0600

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (211 lines)

AND if the testers are confused and those of us that aren't testing are asking questions about problems these records are creating for us and being told that the records that are being creating for A/T entities are wrong... THE TEST IS FLAWED. IT SHOULD BE STOPPED. IT IS SERVING NO PURPOSE. And evaluation based on it is worthless.

I have mixed feelings about RDA. I don't have mixed feelings about this test. It is a disaster and undermines all the work that went into RDA.  

Mary Charles Lasater
Authorities Coordinator
Vanderbilt University
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Mike Tribby
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 8:37 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] Policy Committee meeting outcomes (Clarification on Decision 2)

>I don't think the testers are confused.

Pardon me if this sounds abrupt, but speak for yourself, Bob.




Mike Tribby
Senior Cataloger
Quality Books Inc.
The Best of America's Independent Presses

mailto:[log in to unmask]


-----Original Message-----
From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Robert Maxwell
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 2:56 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Policy Committee meeting outcomes (Clarification on Decision 2)

Mary,

I don't think the testers are confused. No2010160564 is correctly formed under the policies for the test. The new PCC policy is a change affecting this case that will apply after the end of the test.

Bob

Robert L. Maxwell
Head, Special Collections and Formats Catalog Dept.
6728 Harold B. Lee Library
Brigham Young University
Provo, UT 84602
(801)422-5568


-----Original Message-----
From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Mary Mastraccio
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 9:29 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Policy Committee meeting outcomes (Clarification on Decision 2)

John,

Your explanation sounds correct/best to me but that is not what happened in this situation

See n  81079488   100 0   $aShenute,$dca. 348-466
    no2010160564  100 0   $aShenute,$dapproximately 348-466.$tWorks.$kSelections.$lEnglish.$f1993


When I brought this to LC's attention--my understanding of the RDA test rules were that the new record should still follow the established form in the 1xx--I was told:

[LC COMMENT:]  In the document "US RDA Test Policy for the Extra Set: Use of Existing Authority and Bibliographic Records" (http://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/RDAtest/admindoc1.doc) this situation is Scenario 1, section 2:   When the entity represented by the AACR2 form in the 1XX in the authority record is needed as ***part of an authorized access point*** in the bibliographic record (e.g., the person in a name/title access point, the higher body in a body/subordinate body access point, the local place as a qualifier in a conference access point) ....

It would be OK if someone added an AACR2 form in a 7XX field in the new RDA compound authority record, but we weren't requiring people to do that.  As I recall, the coordinating committee didn't want to force people to formulate both an RDA and AACR2 form for the new entity (the time spent was already skewed against RDA for having to record the form in the AACR2 record for the name-only record).
---

Things are still not clear to even the testers, let alone everyone else.

Mary L. Mastraccio, MLS
Cataloging & Authorities Librarian
MARCIVE, Inc.
San Antonio Texas 78265
1-800-531-7678
[log in to unmask]
www.marcive.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Riemer, John
> Sent: Saturday, December 11, 2010 12:30 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] Policy Committee meeting outcomes
> (Clarification on Decision 2)
>
> Bob,
>
> The 1XX forms from existing AACR2 authority records are to be used in
> bibliographic records.  This is true even when the
> AACR2 form represents a "building block" in a new heading being
> formulated.  RDA forms may be added to 7XX fields in the authority
> records, particularly when the heading form would be different.
> Examples:
>
>
> AACR2 authority record
>
> 100 1_ $a Brown, George, $c Rev.
> 700 14 $a Brown, George $c (Clergyman)
>
> New heading needed for cataloging
>
> 100 1_ $a Brown, George, $c Rev. $t Poems 700 14 $a Brown, George $c
> (Clergyman). $t Poems
>
>
> AACR2 authority record
>
> 110 2_ $a Royal College of Physicians of London 710 24 $a Royal
> College of Physicians (London, England)
>
> New heading needed for cataloging
>
> 110 2_ $a Royal College of Physicians of London. $b Tobacco Advisory
> Group 710 24 $a Royal College of Physicians (London, England). $b
> Tobacco Advisory Group
>
>
> The Policy Committee has also slightly revised the final portion of
> Decision 2:
>
> 2. After the test period ends in Dec. 2010, PCC members may continue
> to use the RDA testing guidelines from Jan. 2 until further notice,
> with the exception that already-established
> AACR2 heading forms should be used in bibliographic records.
> This decision will be reevaluated at the time an implementation
> decision is made.
>
>    John
>
> John Riemer
> Head, UCLA Library Cataloging & Metadata Center Kinross South 11020
> Kinross Avenue Box 957230 (campus mail code 723011) Los Angeles, CA
> 90095-7230
> +1 310.825.2901 voice
> +1 310.794.9357 fax
> [log in to unmask]
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Robert Maxwell
> Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 2:04 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] Policy Committee meeting outcomes
>
> Decision 2 needs a bit of clarification, perhaps:
>
> "2. After the test period ends in Dec. 2010, PCC members may continue
> to use the RDA testing guidelines from Jan. 2 until further notice,
> with the exception that already-established
> AACR2 heading forms should be used in bibliographic records.
> This decision will be reevaluated in April 2011."
>
> A. I assume this means we will continue to add 7XX fields to the
> authority records for the RDA form, which may differ from the AACR2
> form in the 1XX field, but we will use the 1XX form in the bib record.
>
> B. What about brand new RDA authority records related to existing
> AACR2 authority forms? Presumably we are to use the RDA form in the
> 1XX of those records (and in the RDA bib record), but what if that
> form differs from the AACR2 form on the related authority record? E.g.
> (example from the "testing
> guidelines"):
>
> AACR2 authority record
>
> 100 1_ $a Brown, George, $c Rev.
> 700 14 $a Brown, George $c (Clergyman)
>
> New RDA authority record
>
> 100 1_ $a Brown, George $c (Clergyman). $t Poems
>
> Bob
>
> Robert L. Maxwell
> Head, Special Collections and Formats Catalog Dept.
> 6728 Harold B. Lee Library
> Brigham Young University
> Provo, UT 84602
> (801)422-5568
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Les Hawkins
> Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 1:49 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Policy Committee meeting outcomes
>
> PCC Colleagues,
>
> The PCC Policy Committee (PoCo) met November 4-5, 2010 for its annual
> meeting. Decisions and action items from the meeting are available and
> posted on the PCC web site:
> http://www.loc.gov/catdir/pcc/PCC-Actions.html
>
> Les Hawkins
> CONSER Coordinator
> Library of Congress
> [log in to unmask]
>

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.449 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3319 - Release Date: 12/16/10 07:34:00

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager