> From: Syd Bauman
> Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 2:40 PM
> Subject: [DATETIME] comments on EDTF Specification DRAFT FOR REVIEW #1
> Permitting both separated and unseparated formats in a specification
> immediately doubles the work of anyone interested in implementing it,
> and in this case it would be for what, to me at least, is no gain and a
> little loss.
I'm going to need to chase down the unseparated form advocates (they are currently inaccessible so it may take a few days) and get a better understanding of the need for it.
I think there is general, perhaps unanimous consensus on the need for the unseparated form and I welcome feedback from those who also need the unseparated form.