On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Stephen Davis <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> [Just coming late to this discussion, so sorry if this has already be talked
> 1) For BCE dates my gut feeling is that the spec should support _naming_ the
> years in normalized, numeric format rather than _calculating_ the years from
> supposed 0 or -1 positions.
I presume the current proposal simply defers to ISO 8601 on BCE dates,
which is entirely appropriate. So perhaps we should avoid debating