That is the appropriate place.
As you probably know, we are not controlling the list of type values for identifier, although we may in the future establish a controlled vocabulary for it.
It makes sense to fix the stylesheet unless people using MODS object to retaining the OCLC number in a converted record.
Rebecca
Rebecca S. Guenther
Senior Networking & Standards Specialist
Network Development & MARC Standards Office
Library of Congress
101 Independence Ave SE
Washington, DC 20540
voice: +1.202.707.5092
fax: +1.202.707.0115
[log in to unmask]
-----Original Message-----
From: Metadata Object Description Schema List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Tod Olson
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 12:36 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [MODS] OCLC number in MARC to MODS conversion
I have a situation where it would be useful to have the OCLC number preserved when a MARC record is converted to MODS, it would make some kinds of linking out from displays a bit more robust. It seems that the OCLC number could go into a <identifier type='oclc'>.
Does anyone see a glaring problem with that idea? Is there a better place that I'm overlooking?
Would there be any interest in a patch to MARC21slim2MODS3-4.xsl for this operation?
-Tod
Tod Olson <[log in to unmask]>
Systems Librarian
University of Chicago Library
|