I've tried Izotope and Sonnox Restore Demo, and to my ears Izotope is not so 
well sounding for NR - too many artifacts despite tuning for various types 
of processing (real-time, "near" real-time, offline processing(. Also, very 
limited and poor declick algorihm.

I will try to get Sonnox for 1000 EUR + more.



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bruce Whisler" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2011 9:29 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] For Mr. Friedman re NR software


I have both Waves and Izotope, and have found Izotope to be the better 
performer in most situations.  Yes, the offline algorithms can be very slow, 
but provide better results than the real time algorithms on musical 
material.

Bruce Whisler

________________________________________
From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List 
[[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Dave Radlauer [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2011 3:25 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [ARSCLIST] For Mr. Friedman re NR software

In a message dated 2/4/11 9:09:15 PM, [log in to unmask] writes:


> I recently tried Izotrope RX as a trial and was quite impressed. Any
> other
> software recommendations and/or thoughts about this particular one?
> Things
> we should consider?
>
For Mr. Friedman

Izotope is very good at the price and comparable to software suites like
Waves Restoration that run closer to $1K+.

The one drawback is that some of the processes put extremly high demands on
CPU.   Other than that they're very good and the cheapest high quality
solution around.

One listmember suggested "You might look at Sound Soap," but my
recommendation is to avoid this software at all cost.   IMHO its one of the 
worst
pieces of audio software I've ever encountered and can easily do more damage 
than
it repairs.

Best,

Dave Radlauer
www.JAZZHOTBigstep.com=