your right, Clickrepair is based on the unique wave form distortion caused by the click.
and you can really fine tune the sensitivity of each.
--- On Sat, 2/5/11, Pete Tinker <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> From: Pete Tinker <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] SV: [ARSCLIST] DC-Art version 7 / 8
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Date: Saturday, February 5, 2011, 7:37 PM
> My preference for ClickRepair over DC
> for impulse noise removal came
> after using DC for about five years. As far as I can
> tell, the major
> difference between the two (for pop and crackle) is that DC
> uses a
> filter approach while I believe ClickRepair recognizes the
> waveform formed by the impulse. It seems much more
> effective to me, but
> that's just my ears' opinions.
> On 2/5/2011 6:02 PM, Dan Nelson wrote:
> > Ive used almost every version of the DC software and i
> still find it can leave a lot of artifacts with their noise
> reduction elements.
> > I have version 8 but havent had time to load and play
> with it yet... ill give it a try and post what it does
> > dnelson
> > --- On Sat, 2/5/11, Jan Myren<[log in to unmask]>
> >> From: Jan Myren<[log in to unmask]>
> >> Subject: [ARSCLIST] SV: [ARSCLIST] Recommendations
> for Software replacement for DC-Art Millennium?
> >> To: [log in to unmask]
> >> Date: Saturday, February 5, 2011, 12:39 PM
> >> HI!
> >> What is actually wrong with DC ART NR software? I
> have used
> >> it for years
> >> with great success, restoring old 78's to CD!
> >> Jan
> >> -----Opprinnelig melding-----
> >> Fra: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion
> >> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> >> På vegne av RA Friedman
> >> Sendt: 4. februar 2011 19:38
> >> Til: [log in to unmask]
> >> Emne: [ARSCLIST] Recommendations for Software
> >> for DC-Art
> >> Millennium?
> >> The Jewish Music Archive at Penn would like to
> upgrade the
> >> software it is
> >> using. I've been doing mostly transfers of
> >> LP's, cassette tapes and
> >> some 78's. The DC-Art software is great for
> >> editing and manual
> >> de-clicking, but the automated algorithms are
> pretty poor
> >> and the continuous
> >> noise module is worse than useless.
> >> I recently tried Izotrope RX as a trial and was
> >> impressed. Any other
> >> software recommendations and/or thoughts about
> >> particular one? Things
> >> we should consider?
> >> Thanks,
> >> RA Friedman, Archivist
> >> Freedman Jewish Sound Archive
> >> University of Pennsylvania
> *Pete Tinker*
> 23257 Gilmore St.
> West Hills, CA 91307
> 818-694-5213 /(cell)/