On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Denenberg, Ray <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Anyway, I have been intending to get back to this issue. I am reasonably persuaded by this and earlier discussion that there is sufficent concern about the use of "/", even though it is part of ISO 8601, that we need to investigate alternatives.
> I haven't thought this all through but would like to suggest this approach: I propose that for a "standard" interval, EDTF prescribe the 8601 approach. For a non-standard (non 8601 conforming) interval we deviate from 8601 and use an alternative syntax that is acceptable to everyone. Does this seems like a reasonable approach?
Am not really following all this. Bottomline, how would I represent
February 11-13, 2010?
It seems entirely natural to me that it would be
"2010-02-11/2010-02-13", but maybe I'm missing something.