LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for DATETIME Archives


DATETIME Archives

DATETIME Archives


[email protected]


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATETIME Home

DATETIME Home

DATETIME  February 2011

DATETIME February 2011

Subject:

season and hemisphere

From:

Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Discussion of the Developing Date/Time Standards <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 15:23:23 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (32 lines)

Representation of season was recently brought up again. In this case the question is whether hemisphere needs to be represented, see below.

My understanding is that the use case presented to us is satisfied, by using 21, 22, 23, 24 in place of month, to represent season.   While not a complete solution it seems to meet the concrete needs that were presented, even if it leaves unsolved some issues regarding sorting, when a season starts, etc. 

 There were other, less specific "potential" use cases presented, which could be satisfied by appending a qualifier to the season.  
So
    '2001-21' means "Spring, 2001"
and
     '2001-21q<xxx>' "Spring, 2001 qualified"  where <xxx> is the qualifier.
The qualifier could be a geographic location, but unless someone takes the initiative to try to develop this qualifier, it's specification won't be included in the spec.

This is where we ended up with this discussion, and as far as I knew everyone was satisfied.  Unless someone has a use case that this doesn't satisfy, I don't see a need to re-open discussion on this.  

Does anyone think this needs further discussion?

--Ray


From: Saašha Metsärantala
> Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 9:17 AM
> Subject: Re: [DATETIME] Revised spec
> > hemisphere seasons represented separately
> I consider there are two different (and related) questions here. One of
> them is whether we need to specify if (for example) "summer 2011 in the
> southern hemispere" or "winter 2011 in the northern hemispere" refer to
> the beginning or the end of the year 2011. The other question is
> whether we need to sort these dates chronologically. Let's assume that
> something occurs in automn / fall 2011 and something else occurs during
> the spring of 2011; do we need to be able to sort these events
> chronologically? If we need that, then we would need to specify the
> hemispere where each of these events occurs.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2022
August 2019
February 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
January 2018
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
August 2016
July 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
December 2014
November 2014
March 2014
September 2013
May 2013
February 2013
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
May 2012
March 2012
December 2011
November 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager