My understanding is that it is no different than the ownership and privacy
rights to personal correspondence.
Bob Olhsson Audio Mastery, Nashville TN
Mastering, Audio for Picture, Mix Evaluation and Quality Control
Over 40 years making people sound better than they ever imagined!
615.562.4346 http://www.bobolhsson.com http://audiomastery.com
From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of adam kolkman
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 3:19 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Thank You for responses to Unpublished Sound
It seems to me that all of the reports produced by the Library of Congress'
National Recording Preservation Board have a major gap in their research.
Non of them seem to address how copyright law treats non-comercial
recordings. Some of these reports look at specific instances, such as
recordings of non-commercial radio stations, but they fall way short of
comprehensively treating the issue. Do any of you know much about this
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Phil Nohl
<[log in to unmask]>wrote:
> Thanks to all who have so far responded to my email.
> The following links have been forwarded to me.
> The report commissioned for and sponsored by The National Recording
> Preservation Board on Pre-1972 Copyrights is fascinating, though much
> still remains confusing to me. With amateur recordings, there are
> often no "recorded on" dates written on a label (and many times not
> even a full name). All that remains is the recording itself.
> Phil Nohl