LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  March 2011

ARSCLIST March 2011

Subject:

Re: Turnover and rolloff curves for correct playback of 78 rpm records!

From:

Robert Cham <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 6 Mar 2011 12:29:29 -0600

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (121 lines)

I used to use a parametric equalizer for that.  Any of them would do 
fine, but this one happened to be in a McCurdy console.  The 
technique was the same as yours.

The advantage of a good parametric equalizer is that you can vary the 
"Q" which is in effect the width of the notch.  Too narrow of a 
notch, which graphic equalizers frequently are can causes ringing. 
you can sort of accomplish the same thing with a graphic by making 
the curve more gradual using the adjacent controls.

The Mc Curdys were great equalizers fo 78s, especially combined with 
the preamp controls on the old EMT turntables that we used to use.

Bob Cham




>It's not just the top and bottom, it also is the middle.  All 
>acoustical recordings have horn resonances, and if you use a 
>parametric equalizer you boost the midband and sweep it up and down 
>till you really hear a BIG boost -- and then you cut it a at that 
>frequency a few dBs below the rest to even out that resonance.  With 
>a graphic eq you can smooth out several resonances.  Tom Owen was 
>the first to really address that issue when he introduced the Owl I. 
>The Urei Multifilter is also useful.  You will also find resonant 
>peaks in electrical recordings.  I am surprised that this has not 
>been discussed much here.
>
>Mike Biel  [log in to unmask]
>
>On 3/6/2011 7:04 AM, Tom Fine wrote:
>>One man's opinions/experiences ...
>>
>>You need to use your ears. These are guidelines, not rules. I've 
>>never liked the sound of anything with flat rolloff, it's always 
>>too noisy. The early stuff has very limited high-frequency content 
>>so you can rolloff quite a bit without effecting any recorded sound 
>>that made it into the shellac pressing you are playing. It gets 
>>more interesting in the electronic era because there comes a point 
>>-- different times for different record companies, when there 
>>actually is important audible content in the "treble" range and 
>>it's loudness is effected by both turnover and rolloff since you 
>>are both moving and bending the curve. Start with the "common 
>>wisdom" and then season to taste. There are many, many listings 
>>online of different curves recommended for different record 
>>companies in different eras. I have found the "common wisdom" on 
>>RCA, USA Decca, Capitol and Mercury to be my preferred settings in 
>>most cases. The "common wisdom" on pre-electric anything, Columbia, 
>>Okeh, Vocalion and British HMV does not suit my ears, I usually 
>>tweak those to sound best to the content (most content, least 
>>noise, to over-simplify it). Almost uniformly, my experience is 
>>that the later-era the 78, the easier it is to pull the content out 
>>of the grooves. Early stuff is a challenge and there's only so much 
>>content there.
>>
>>Also note that not all recordings were made to allegedly "standard" 
>>curves, not all recordings sound good to begin with and not all 
>>pressings are uniformly good. So, use the options of variable EQ to 
>>bring out maximum audibility and clarity. Basically, you'll find a 
>>pair of settings that sounds "best" for every record. Sometimes it 
>>sounds clearly "best" compared to all other settings (instruments 
>>sound natural, balance of the ensemble sounds right, background 
>>noise does not distract), sometimes it sounds "least bad" because 
>>the recording was bad or the pressing is bad, etc. If your preamp 
>>has high-pass and low-pass filters, also experiment with them. You 
>>can further bring out the program content and reduce the background 
>>noise sometimes.
>>
>>I also try to go for the best sound quality at each stage of analog 
>>playback so you can then use a minimal number of stages. If I can 
>>get a "best" sound right at the phono preamp, then I don't need to 
>>insert EQ into the signal chain. In the case of 78's, if I can play 
>>it back crisp, clear and relatively quiet, then I don't need to 
>>mess with DSP noise reduction or EQ in the computer. Also, using 
>>the combination of turnover and rolloff to both bend and move the 
>>curve sometimes produces much better-sounding results than blind 
>>adherence to "common wisdom" with after-the-fact reliance on 
>>heavy-handed EQ to "quiet things down." This method is widely used 
>>on low-cost reissues of 78's, they are usually chopped off 
>>somewhere around 10k and "NR'd" to death so all the low-level 
>>content is removed and it's like listening to a low-grade AM 
>>broadcast.
>>
>>Always rely on your own ears and taste rather than machines. 
>>Documentation and "common wisdom" is the place to start, not the 
>>place to end.
>>
>>-- Tom Fine
>>
>>----- Original Message ----- From: "Jan Myren" <[log in to unmask]>
>>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2011 5:33 AM
>>Subject: [ARSCLIST] Turnover and rolloff curves for correct 
>>playback of 78 rpm records!
>>
>>>HI!
>>>
>>>I am about to learn to find the general correct turnover and rolloff curves
>>>for US and European 78 rpm records.
>>>So far I have learned:
>>>
>>>US 78 rpm records:
>>>Pre. 1938: turnover 500 (RIIA), rolloff FLAT
>>>After 1938: turnover 500 (RIIA), rolloff -5
>>>
>>>European 78 rpm records:
>>>Pre 1938: turnover 300, rolloff FLAT
>>>After 1938, turnover 300, rolloff -5
>>>
>>>Can anybody share their experiences within this matter, please?
>>>
>>>All the best
>>>Jan Myren


-- 
Bob Cham
KTRU FM
Houston

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager