On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Simon Grant <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On 7 March 2011 19:53, Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Looking quickly at it, it appears to allow you to say things like:
>> "1999///Christmas edition" or more generally "YYYY/MM/DD/otherinfo" where
>> "otherinfo'" can be any string, used to qualify the date.
>> My first question is: is this a requirement?
> To me, Ray, the general issue (not just here) is that there doesn't seem to
> be a criterion for distinguishing criteria from non-criteria, apart from how
> persistent people are, and whether they can think of at least one example
> where it might be used. Is that really enough to base a spec on?
It's a reasonable question.