From: Saašha Metsärantala
> Sent: Friday, May 13, 2011 2:24 PM
> In this e-mail, I suggest some small changes or clarifications to the
Thanks, I've made all of the suggested corrections, except:
> #325 - I would suggest to clarify how we propose to store that in XML
The proposal is not to represent the value as an XML attribute but rather as the content of the XML element. In #326 "Temporal Expressions; Named periods/event", the syntax is described as xs:anyURI. I've removed the quotes which had been surrounding the examples in #325, in case that was what caused confusion.
> > Volatile / dynamic dates
> I assume we mean "deictic dates" and, in this case, I would suggest to
> use the word "deictic" for clarity.
For clarity? I've never heard the word before.
> Otherwise, the reader may wonder
> what kind of "nearly-deicitc" but "non-diectic" thing we mean here.
In fact I can't tell if it's deicitc or diectic.
Anyway, I changed "Volatile/dynamic dates" to "Volatile/dynamic/contextual" dates.