> From: Saašha Metsärantala
> Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2011 2:51 PM
> > So we could:
> > (a) not include the feature. just profile it out. We don't really
> need it, there are other ways to express 1900 through 1999.
> > (b) leave it as is. Call the feature "100 year period" and include
> the note.
> > I believe it is an extraneous feature, and given that plus the
> ambiguity in 8601, I would prefer (b).
> I consider that (b) is OK, but I would prefer (a).
Sorry, that was a typo on my part, I meant (a).