LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  August 2011

ARSCLIST August 2011

Subject:

Re: digital input sound card recommendation

From:

Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 11 Aug 2011 06:44:06 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (207 lines)

Hi Konrad:

This is very helpful. Thank you. My thinking was apparently based on previous generations of 
technology.

My DAW is circa 2009 and is somewhat old-school in that it's a Windows XP (not emulated, real-deal 
XP Pro), uses PCI interfaces (a linked pair of CardDeluxe) and all the external drives are Firewire. 
It's rock-stable and works fine. When it dies, I will need to rethink this whole MO.

As far as Firewire cables and connectors, I've never had a problem BUT all my stuff is wired up once 
and never touched after that. I can see your point when it's a multi-user setting, but it seems like 
the USB connectors and cables would be just as bad. Agree that "in the box" Firewire cables can be 
quite cheapo. I've always used Belkin after-market cables, which have thicker insultion and seem to 
be well-constructed and well-shielded.

In general, your statement about keeping audio outside the box is very sensible. CardDeluxe happen 
to be well-build and have always run dead-quiet in my systems, but I've had varying levels of noise 
and hash with Soundblaster, Ensoniq and M-Audio PCI cards over the years. It seems more dependent on 
specific computers' internal environments than specific cards; a card that is noisy in PC 1 will run 
just fine in PC 2, etc. I assume a Lynx or RME PCI card would be designed and built as well as a 
CardDeluxe and would thus run dead-quiet in any or most PC's. But, as I said, next time out I need 
to rethink all of this in light of advanced technology.

-- Tom Fine

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Konrad Strauss" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 9:46 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] digital input sound card recommendation


> My problem with firewire is the cables and connectors. Especially the
> connector which is easily dislodged, not a good thing when recording
> audio. As Bob Olhsson mentioned, the build quality of cables is generally
> poor. Both firewire and USB are capable of isochronous data transfer so
> there is no reason why firewire should perform better. However Firewire is
> peer-to-peer whereas USB requires the host to arbitrate traffic and since
> USB will also have input devices (mouse and keyboard) attached, I suppose
> it's possible that this could interfere with streaming audio. But if you
> do the math, both Firewire and USB should be able to handle over 80
> channels of 96-24 audio input/output, so there should be enough overhead
> to fit a couple of mouse clicks in-between the audio stream. (For the
> record real-world transfer rates are about about 25-30% below the stated
> max)
>
> In general I feel it is a bad idea to have AD conversion in the computer -
> it is full of EM interference and clock chatter. Try this experiment: take
> a piece of 24 gauge wire and wrap a half dozen tight loops ~1" diameter in
> the middle. Solder the ends to pin 1 & 2 of an XLR and plug it into a mic
> input of a mixer, crank up the gain and hold the loops next to your
> computer - all that crap you hear is also being picked up by your ADC. An
> outboard unit will be better shielded and isolated.
>
> -- 
> Konrad Strauss
> Director of Recording Arts, Professor of Music
> Indiana University Jacobs School of Music
> http://mypage.iu.edu/~kstrauss
> http://www.music.indiana.edu/departments/academic/recording-arts/
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 8/10/11 8:16 AM, "Tom Fine" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Hi Konrad:
>
> Thanks for the information and clarification.
>
> So your preferred system is an internal AES/EBU card and do all the ADC
> and DAC through external
> units not integrated with the computer, so the computer is more a "record
> and playback head" than a
> full-fledged "tape machine"? I've thought about going this way with my
> next DAW, not using the
> computer for any analog interface, either way, but using it as a storage,
> processing and editing
> system all in the digital world.
>
> What is it about Firewire cables and connectors that you find to be
> "dodgy"? I thought Firewire was
> the more reliable interface for constant-stream data like digital audio
> and video, that USB was
> designed more for bursts of data like moving files between hard drives or
> emptying photos off a
> camera or sending a document to a printer.
>
> -- Tom Fine
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Konrad Strauss" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 9:30 PM
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] digital input sound card recommendation
>
>
>> +1 on the Lynx cards. We have six AES16 that have been in service for
>>four
>> years now. As with all computer systems they require tweaking from time
>>to
>> time as the OS is updated, but I've found maintenance to be pretty
>> straight-forward.
>>
>> To answer a couple of Tom's points below, jitter is not a issue in
>> digital-to-digital data flow. This is called interface jitter, and as
>>long
>> as the samples arrive at their destination intact no harm is done. (The
>>he
>> other kind of jitter is called sampling jitter, it happens during ADC and
>> can cause major problems) So Firewire and USB interfaces are not
>> necessarily bad, it really depends on the implementation. Personally, I
>> dislike the cables and connectors, especially Firewire. The whole system
>> seems dodgy to me. You can also run into problems if you want to use
>> Firewire/USB DAC and ADC units from different manufacturers, often this
>>is
>> impossible because of incompatible drivers. I much prefer to stick with
>> AES.
>>
>> The interaction between audio and video subsystems is probably caused by
>> an IRQ conflics. My memory is a little hazy since I haven't had to deal
>> with this for a few years, but occasionally PCI slots will share the same
>> IRQ address so if the audio and video card are in slots that share,
>> glitches can be put into the audio stream when minimizing windows or a
>> monitor going to sleep. Usually the recommendation is that if this
>>happens
>> try swapping PCI slots. I think that in Windows 7 you can manually assign
>> IRQ addresses but like I said I haven't had to deal with this for a while
>> so I may be misremembering.
>>
>> -- 
>> Konrad Strauss
>> Director of Recording Arts, Professor of Music
>> Indiana University Jacobs School of Music
>> http://mypage.iu.edu/~kstrauss
>> http://www.music.indiana.edu/departments/academic/recording-arts/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/9/11 1:46 PM, "Tom Fine" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi David:
>>
>> That's a real bummer. Those are my front-line ADC's too.
>>
>> There has been much progress in recent years with external ADC's.
>>However,
>> I keep reading articles
>> and papers about the USB connection not being ideal due to jitter and
>> latency issues. And yet,
>> firewire keeps getting de-emphasized by hardware manufacturers. I'm also
>> not sure what role video
>> circuitry plays in a modern Windows system. Even thru XP, there was some
>> interaction between digital
>> audio and the video subsystem, I'm not expert enough to discuss details
>> but there are articles and
>> white papers out there.
>>
>> If you're doing your analog-to-digital conversion externally and then
>> "recording" an AES/EBU stream,
>> it seems like you could use a very simple interface, but again I'm not
>> sure how much clocking and
>> latency matter in that setup.
>>
>> I've had some CardDeluxe cards since 1999 and they still work fine. Why
>> not just recycle them as you
>> upgrade computers, or are you building out more workstations and now need
>> a new way to skin the cat?
>>
>> -- Tom Fine
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "David Seubert" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 1:38 PM
>> Subject: [ARSCLIST] digital input sound card recommendation
>>
>>
>>> This discussion has come up repeatedly over the years but I just learned
>>>that the Digital Audio
>>> Labs CardDelux has been discontinued. I'm not sure why they have been
>>>discontinued, but we got a
>>> call from the manufacturer who said that they are "obsolete." We have
>>>long used their cards (we
>>> are a PC shop) and I need to spec out another PC-based audio
>>>workstation. I use the CardDelux for
>>> the AES/EBU digital inputs.
>>>
>>> What are people using for digital input from an external ADC these days?
>>>Is there an equivalent
>>> sound card to the DAL card with AES/EBU digital inputs? I know some ADCs
>>>offer firewire/USB
>>> outputs, but I haven't really explored that.
>>>
>>> Please send any suggestions to me on or off list.
>>>
>>> David Seubert
>>> UCSB
>>>
>>
> 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager