On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Denenberg, Ray <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I'll be away the next two weeks (and much of the week following). It would be good if those of you who have time could review the specification:
> and the bnf
> during the next three weeks.
> I'd like to think that the spec is stable, but I suspect that there are some errors/discrepancies in the bnf. BNFs are always better when more people look at them.
FWIW, one of the developers I work with (on CSL) created a Ruby
implementation based on the spec.