From: Patent Tactics, George Brock-Nannestad
> http://euroalert.net/en/news.aspx?idn=13408
>
> Cary Ginell
>
Well, why did you permit the term to be 95 years in the US? Apparently Europe
"only" wants to put us on "a more equal footing". To prolong protection
without making it contingent on contiued availability is folly, and our
politicians were not the first to succumb to lobbyism. Charity begins at
home.
Kind regards,
George
|