Such a detailed syntax reminds me of the suggestion I made on June, 28th
for reliability and probabilities. Of course, I really like the idea of
something that detailed for precision, too!
Maybe we could introduce such a feature in EDTF version 1.1 or phase 2 (or
what we choose to call it). Is there any decision made about when the next
version or phase of EDTF should be achieved?
> "Some year in Milenium 171000 and the estimate is 171010000"
Is it really what it would mean? Or is there a typo here?
Furthermore, I suggest to rewrite the (probably misspelled)
in the BNF.