DATETIME September 2011
Re: long year - why y? and new production
"Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress" <[log in to unmask]>
Discussion of the Developing Date/Time Standards <[log in to unmask]>
Fri, 2 Sep 2011 10:12:57 -0400
From: Saa¹ha Metsärantala
> I wonder whether we really need a "y"-prefix before "long years"?
Well, 'y20110902' means "year 20110902". Without the 'y' it's '20110902'
which one might reasonably interpret as "September 2, 2011".
Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink
Subscribe or Unsubscribe