LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for BIBFRAME Archives


BIBFRAME Archives

BIBFRAME Archives


[email protected]


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BIBFRAME Home

BIBFRAME Home

BIBFRAME  November 2011

BIBFRAME November 2011

Subject:

Re: What the data tells us

From:

"Riley, Charles" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative Forum <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sat, 5 Nov 2011 05:42:46 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (32 lines)

What are some of the more compelling use cases that could be imagined surrounding MARC data that never makes it into the OPAC? I can think of some examples that would be robust, but where Roy's suggestion of a modular approach would probably still work out for the best in practice: not every library has the same range of materials; not every patron holds to a consistent pattern of searching. If catalogers are true to the granularity of their material, and systems librarians can readily see how it should fit together, the data will make it out to the user.

Two quick examples of where MARC is falling short on what a modular approach would bring--(1) parallel 880 fields for non-Latin scripts, where the values in the subfield 6 aren't deterministic according to the field they're in (100, 245, etc.), but determined by their sequential appearance within a record--hard for programmers to work with, and not easy to strip out if they're not needed in a local system. (2) 6XX subfield y for chronological subheadings; it sort of lends itself to faceting by time period but the results can be messy, although this is more a result of how LCSH works out conceptually.

Charles Riley

________________________________________
From: Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative Forum [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of J. McRee Elrod [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2011 1:41 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [BIBFRAME] What the data tells us

Roy Tennant <[log in to unmask]> wrote:


>"Implications of MARC Tag Usage on Library Metadata Practices"
>http://www.oclc.org/research/publications/library/2010/2010-06.pdf

This study told us what fields were in records, not whether those
fields were utilized in OPACs. MARC has a wealth if information never
put to practical use. Which fields were coded is fairly useless
information.

A study of what fields OPACs actually use might be helpful, but that
still does not tell us what fields might be helpful to patrons if they
were utilized,'


   __ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod ([log in to unmask])
  {__ | / Special Libraries Cataloguing HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
  ___} |__ \__________________________________________________________

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
July 2011
June 2011

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager