LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for BIBFRAME Archives


BIBFRAME Archives

BIBFRAME Archives


BIBFRAME@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BIBFRAME Home

BIBFRAME Home

BIBFRAME  November 2011

BIBFRAME November 2011

Subject:

Re: Top-down or bottom-up? Example for a simple web service

From:

"J. McRee Elrod" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative Forum <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 22 Nov 2011 08:23:44 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (94 lines)

Bernhard Eversberg <[log in to unmask]> wrote:


>And for the cataloging rules, card layout was eminently important
>because the card was at once the product of cataloging *and* the user
>interface.

The cataloguer did much more than created the display embodied in the
unit card.  The cataloguer took those card and constructed a
catalogue, with multiple entries, cross references, and in some places
during its later year,s experimented with innovations such as divided
catalogues, guide carded ticked tracing catalogues, and inverse
chronological order in subject catalogues.

Nicholson Baker has written a loving memorial:

http://www.newyorker.com/archive/1994/04/04/1994_04_04_064_TNY_CARDS_000365934

Those days are long gone for most libraries (we cease card production the
end of this year). 
 
>RDA does not ignore ISBD altogether, but it assumes that catalogers
>have no direct business any more with the user interface.
 
That is a *very* bad assumption.  With automation, cataloguers
abandoned catalogue construction to the programmers, with terrible
results: fragmented displays, misleading and space consuming labels,
illogical hitlists (e.g., inverse chronological display under subject
not being the default), failure to take full advantage of classed
subject searching,  failure to utilize the wealth if information in
MARC fixed fields, and ISBD deconstruction making nonsense of
punctuation based on following field (in part a fault of ISBD for not
prescribing ending punctuation as such, as opposed to "introducing"
the next field).

Perhaps one of the most startling failures of both card and automated
catalogues is failure to take advantage of classification as a mode of
subject search.  I wrote an article on the few classed card
catalogues:  

Elrod, J. McRee. "The Classed Catalog in the Fifties," 142-156. LRTS
Vol. 5, 1961.

There have been few fully functional automated classed catalogues (at
least in North America), including multiple class number entry for
single works (UTLAs did have a field for it), and alphabetical
indexes, despite their advantages in a multilingual situation where
multiple indexes in different languages could be used to access a
single classed catalogue.

Our legacy records may not be all we might wish, but we have hardly
scratched the surface in utilizing their data.  The classification
numbers they contain is at the top of that list.

>And yet, for all the new qualities and functionality our data are
>supposed to have, the end products will have to satisfy the needs of
>humans - 

Yes!!

>Around 2003, IFLA ran a Task Force on Guidelines for OPAC displays, and
>Martha Yee came up with a still recommendable report.
 
Yes.  Yee's work is excellent, but IFLA subsequently dropped the ball.
 
http://slc.bc.ca/yee.pdf

>It should still serve libraries well to have a recognizable standard 
>for bibliographic data display, applied and understood the world over.

Yes!!.  The loss of catalogue use skill transfer among libraries is one
of the major effects of the end if the card catalogue era.

Robert Fulghum said that he learned all he really needed to know in
kindergarten:

http://www.peace.ca/kindergarten.htm

It was not until later in primary school that I learned to use (and as
a library assistant to file) a card catalogue.  That skill served me
through three master's degrees.  No more.  The OPACs of most libraries
I enter are a mystery to me.  The last library I visited (a tax
supported institution), required an ID number to sign on to the OPAC.  
I could no longer just pull open a drawer, or even click a mouse.

Thinkers from Occam to Einstein have praised simplicity.  We seem to be 
descending into ever greater complexity.



   __       __   J. McRee (Mac) Elrod ([log in to unmask])
  {__  |   /     Special Libraries Cataloguing   HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
  ___} |__ \__________________________________________________________

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
July 2011
June 2011

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager