Quoting Richard Light <[log in to unmask]>:
> On 08/11/2011 22:35, Karen Coyle wrote:
>> Quoting Owen Stephens <[log in to unmask]>:
>> Owen, thanks. It's interesting that your solution of separating the
>> pre-coordinated "facets" is what worked best...
> Isn't this in effect the FAST  approach? Any news on FAST as Linked Data?
I asked about this earlier on the list, and was informed, off-list
(why won't LC folks post to their own lists?!) that LC was no longer
interested in FAST, and was concentrating on getting the various
"facets" into LCSH in SKOS. I still think it would be interesting to
have an open list of FAST that wasn't subject to OCLC's research
license. It might encourage more folks to experiment with it.
>  http://www.oclc.org/research/activities/fast/default.htm
> *Richard Light*
[log in to unmask] http://kcoyle.net