LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for BIBFRAME Archives


BIBFRAME Archives

BIBFRAME Archives


BIBFRAME@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BIBFRAME Home

BIBFRAME Home

BIBFRAME  November 2011

BIBFRAME November 2011

Subject:

NISO offers itself as the standards body for future format

From:

Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Wed, 2 Nov 2011 12:20:47 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (43 lines)

Sorry to repeat this to so many lists, but the most recent NISO newsletter:

http://www.niso.org/publications/newsline/2011/newslinenov2011.html

makes the case that NISO may be the more appropriate body for the  
development of the future data format for libraries. Quoting from the  
message by Todd Carpenter:

"The MARC standards office at LC is adeptly led and they have the best  
of intentions, with a goal of trying to represent and serve all that  
use this important format. However, there is a fine line between  
leadership and control. Hopefully, LC is willing to lead while letting  
the broader community control, as messy as that process might be.

The process for moving MARC into today's information environment is  
important, as noted above. Wouldn't the process be better served by  
utilizing the existing and open standards development processes  
already in place that have served our community so well in so many  
areas?"

I had been about to post a response to the plan suggesting that there  
are a number of non-library standards bodies that would have a lot to  
contribute: in particular, W3C would be important, since LC feels that  
RDF (a W3C standard) should be used (and I believe that library data  
is a good test case for the Semantic Web standards that exist today).  
NISO by its nature covers a broader constituency than LC, and, most  
importantly, is the venue that gathers together the vendors that serve  
libraries and create library systems.

No standards process is perfect, and none are particularly rapid.  
Broad participation and the widest variety of use cases for the data  
will assure an outcome that serves the greatest number of potential  
users.

kc

-- 
Karen Coyle
[log in to unmask] http://kcoyle.net
ph: 1-510-540-7596
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
July 2011
June 2011

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager