On 11/01/2012, Carl Pultz wrote:
> * I'm not going to quote Spinal Tap. * * I'm not going to quote Spinal
> Tap. * * I'm not going to quote Spinal Tap. *
> Dolby clearly became synonymous with state-of-the-art and good-sound,
> so studios probably had to use it, even when not really necessary.
> It's the way the business seems to work.
> But, given all the errors that are endemic to decoded playback, maybe
> a decode "model" needn't be too concerned with strict accuracy. Maybe
> it only has to sound good?
Maybe it could even sound better if not strictly accurate.
[log in to unmask]