LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for BIBFRAME Archives


BIBFRAME Archives

BIBFRAME Archives


BIBFRAME@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BIBFRAME Home

BIBFRAME Home

BIBFRAME  January 2012

BIBFRAME January 2012

Subject:

Re: Thoughts on provenance

From:

"Goldfarb, Kathie" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative Forum <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 12 Jan 2012 08:27:37 -0600

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (1 lines)

I have just been lurking, but as I read this thread, I just want to jump in.

Re: Who created the 'record' I have been a cataloger for over 30 years. Things have obviously changed. In the past, who created the record, and subsequent updates, would determine how much review was done, institutions we could trust and did not need to go over with a fine tooth comb, and those that needed to be examined carefully. If we want to be sure that we have found the correct information, this is still important.
- Unfortunately, more recently it is a question about determining if these two (or more) records are for the same item. If they are the same, sometimes merging information from all to create a better record.

Re: "carry forward only what can be justified by real requirements from real users", do we really know? Starting out with a new format, we don't need to keep all that information necessarily in the same order with the same priority, but at this point, are we sure what will be needed in the future? I personally have always questioned the place of publication appearing to be more important than the publisher, and with publishers merging and changing names and moving, how useful is it today? But I certainly don't know what the future will bring, I would hate to not even provide a place for that information, then realize 10 yrs down the road that times have changed again and that data would have been helpful. Maybe moving the 'less needed' data to what we would currently consider a 500 notes field would at least preserve what we have while keeping it 'out of the way'

kathie

Kathleen Goldfarb
Technical Services Librarian
College of the Mainland
Texas City, TX 77539
409 933 8202

 Please consider whether it is necessary to print this email.


-----Original Message-----
From: Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Kevin M Randall
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 1:35 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [BIBFRAME] Thoughts on provenance

Roy Tennant wrote:

> In all of my 37 years working in libraries I've never
> encountered a situation where it was necessary to know where the title
> came from to do useful work with bibliographic data. In what situations is this
> necessary, and why?

Okay, it looks like we've got two different meanings of "provenance" going on in this thread. I think Kelley McGrath started out talking about "provenance" meaning WHO CREATED the metadata. Because some of the message talked about sources of data on the resource, this got morphed into a discussion also about WHERE THE DATA APPEARED ON THE RESOURCE.

That being said, I think that *both* things are useful. I would consider myself quite blessed if I were able to say that I've never needed to have this information through my entire career. If we're talking about creator of the metadata, that would be very, very useful in so many situations. In a MARC record, when there is more than one institution identified in the 040 field, there are many times I have needed to know, for example, which library changed to serial from active to ceased, or which library added a note or added entry--at the very least, so I could contact that library and determine if something I have in hand is really the same thing as what the other cataloger saw. And if we're talking about where on the resource the data appears, that is also helpful, especially with resources having the same or similar titles, and/or bearing multiple publisher/issuing body names.

And in regard to the idea that we should "carry forward only what can be justified by real requirements from real users", I would certainly hope that we keep in mind that people who create, manipulate, and manage metadata ARE "real users"!

Kevin M. Randall
Principal Serials Cataloger
Bibliographic Services Dept.
Northwestern University Library
1970 Campus Drive
Evanston, IL 60208-2300
email: [log in to unmask]
phone: (847) 491-2939
fax: (847) 491-4345

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
July 2011
June 2011

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager