LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  April 2012

ARSCLIST April 2012

Subject:

Re: Berliner record material, was: Hi Fi Brownwax

From:

David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 22 Apr 2012 00:59:46 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (189 lines)

Well, according to Fred Gaisberg -- thank you Michael Shoshani, for copying
that quote -- the "imitation hard rubber" would have been a shellac
compound, and those are the Berliners I have seen, admittedly not very
many. I guess this would be the introduction of shellac into the
manufacture of flat disc records. If so, it was a good idea that lasted
close to 65 years.

And thanks all, for the info on rubber records. Has anyone here ever played
one?

Dave Lewis
Lebanon, OH

On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Paul Charosh <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> The discs I own recorded in 1895 are very well recorded.  Played on  modern
> equipment, the voices are loud and clear.  But when were they  pressed, and
> on what material?  Some tend to be a bit thicker than later  discs.  Are
> they "hard rubber" or "imitation hard rubber"?  I have no  idea.
>
> Paul Charosh
>
>
> In a message dated 4/21/2012 8:26:05 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> [log in to unmask] writes:
>
> From:  Patent Tactics, George Brock-Nannestad
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Emile Berliner  in testimony for a court case in England between the
> Gramophone Co. and  Nicole Record Co. wrote the following in a letter of
> information to the  British attorneys on 18 June 1903 (p. 2):
>
> ............................  In 1894 hard rubber records pressed
> under heat and cooling were sold by  the United States
> Gramophone Company of Washington D.C. and in 1895 the
> Berliner Gramophone Company of Philadelphia, likewise sold
> hard rubber  gramophone records in large quantities.
> It was found that the pressing of  perfect records in hard
> rubber was attended with considerable difficulty,  and upon
> enquiry I was referred to the Duranoid Manufacturing Co.
> of  Newark, N.J. who were making articles of commerce in
> immitation [sic] of  hard rubber, the composition of which nor
> the procedure of making it, or  pressing it, were unknown
> to me.     I started negotiations  with them for the Berliner
> Gramophone Company of Philadelphia, and the  Duranoid Co.
> agreed to furnish us copies in their hard rubber substitute
> if we would give them the matrices, but they did not
> divulge to the  Berliner Gramophone Company nor to me, nor
> to anyone connected with us,  how they made such imitation
> hard rubber sound records.      Since the Duranoid Company
> had no difficulty in furhishing us with any  number of
> perfect copies, we decided to give up the hard rubber and use
> only records similar in every respect in general appearance
> to hard  rubber, except that the Duranoid Company told us
> that could furnish  records in any color desired.
> .......................
>
> So, Gelatt was  right, as he generally was. The only problem with his book
> is
> that it does  not give any sources for his correct information.
>
> Kind  regards,
>
>
> George
>
>
> > The rubber disc story comes from  Gelatt. I have never seen one, and have
> > never known anyone to  encounter one, but that doesn't mean they might
> not
> > have existed. I  think that if you found one, it may not be playable by
> > conventional  methods no matter how hard it might have been originally
> > because very  old rubber tends to dry out and split.
> >
> > And I have no  confidence in rubber as a viable playing surface.
> >
> > Dave  Lewis
> > Lebanon, OH
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 6:41 PM,  [log in to unmask] <
> > [log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> > > Berliner did use hard rubber for a little while, in the early  days,
> did
> > I
> > > read that or did I make that up?
> >  >
> > > Perhaps a rubber disc would have sounded this quiet?
> >  >
> > > Has anyone ever heard a straight transfer of a hard rubber  disc?
> > >
> > > joe salerno
> > >
> > >
> >  >
> > > On 4/21/2012 4:56 PM, George Brock-Nannestad wrote:
> >  >
> > >> From: Patent Tactics, George Brock-Nannestad
> >  >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Alas, we shall  probably never know, for in the noise lies the
> > >>  authentication.
> > >>
> > >> And that is the true reason  why we must conserve the originals: all
> > other
> > >>  authenticity relies on a certificate appended to any digital copy
> made.
> > >> But
> > >> that is a mere witness statement.  The scientific approach to revisit
> > >> samples
> > >>  will have been made impossible without the originals.
> > >>
> >  >> Best wishes,
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>  George
> > >>
> > >>  ------------------------------**--------
> > >>
> >  >>
> > >>  Very quiet surface. IS it safe to assume that  this was filtered, or
> > did
> > >>> these early records  sound this good?
> > >>>
> > >>> joe salerno
> >  >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On 4/21/2012 8:24 AM,  Milan P Milovanovic wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> How  about 1890s Berliner 5 inch record #532, La rondinella.
> >  >>>>
> > >>>>
> >
> http://www.archeophone.org/**Berliner5inch/berliner-532.php<
> http://www.arche
> >  ophone.org/Berliner5inch/berliner-532.php>
> > >>>>
> >  >>>> Almost as recorded through mic...
> >  >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> >  >>>> ----- Original Message ----- From:  "[log in to unmask]"
> > >>>>  <[log in to unmask]>
> > >>>>  To:<[log in to unmask]>
> > >>>> Sent: Friday,  April 20, 2012 6:26 AM
> > >>>> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Hi Fi  Brownwax
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> >  >>>>  Rather astounding. It must have really sounded great  thru
> eartubes.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> joe  salerno
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> >  >>>>> On 4/19/2012 10:56 PM, David Lewis wrote:
> >  >>>>>
> > >>>>>> This was posted via  Jerry Fabris on YouTube. The audio quality of
> > >>>>>>  this 1899
> > >>>>>> cylinder is stunning:
> >  >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> >
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?**v=g0yWY_RXW6A&feature=related<
> http://www.yout
> >  ube.com/watch?v=g0yWY_RXW6A&feature=related>
> >  >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Dave Lewis
> >  >>>>>> Lebanon, OH
> > >>>>>>
> >  >>>>>>
> > >>>>> --
> >  >>>>> Joe Salerno
> > >>>>>
> >  >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>> --
> >  >>> Joe Salerno
> > >>>
> > >>
> >  >>
> > > --
> > > Joe Salerno
> >  >
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager