Same here.
I do think there is scope for this kind of journal, but as with
any other journal, its success would depend largely on the energy
of the editor and editorial board in soliciting articles and
ensuring that they meet a high standard of quality.
Thanks,
Chris Prom
University of Illinois
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012, Ethan Gruber wrote:
> I also didn't reply. I would read and contribute to something like this.
>
> Ethan
>
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Bleier, Karen <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> I'm curious, because I remember your original post, and I don't think I
>> responded before something distracted me. I imagine others did the same.
>>
>> So, my question: 17 people said they would read it; how many said they
>> wouldn't?
>>
>> I and my colleagues almost certainly would read it. Sorry I didn't
>> respond initially.
>>
>> Karen Bleier, MLS
>> Research Librarian
>> 816-822-3418
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Encoded Archival Description List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
>> Behalf Of Leah Prescott
>> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 1:08 PM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: Practical Technical Journal for Archives
>>
>> I think this could very well be one of those instances where people don't
>> realize how valuable it might be until there is an example. I'm a big
>> believer in creating a straw man and then adjusting as others react -
>> rather than needing an idea to be fully fleshed-out and vetted before
>> taking a step forward.
>>
>> Also, if there is interest from only a small number of people I don't
>> think you should take that as an indication that it is an any less valuable
>> thing to do. If just a few people start some mechanism, even an informal
>> one, to share ideas and help one another, then that becomes a core that can
>> be built upon as others start to see the value. I say go for it on a small
>> scale - just my opinion.
>>
>> Leah
>>
>>
>> Leah Prescott
>> Digital Projects Coordinator
>> Washington Research Library Consortium
>> 901 Commerce Drive
>> Upper Marlboro, MD 20774
>> 301-390-2004
>> [log in to unmask]
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Encoded Archival Description List [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
>> Of Randall Miles [[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 1:08 PM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Practical Technical Journal for Archives
>>
>> Please excuse cross posts.
>>
>> About two weeks ago I posted regarding a practical technical journal for
>> archives. I had three questions:
>>
>>
>> 1. Does such a journal exist? Based on the responses no, there is no
>> such journal.
>>
>> 2. Would you read such a journal? 17 people responded that they
>> would.
>>
>> 3. Would you submit articles to such a journal? 5 of the 17 who said
>> they would read it also said they would likely submit articles.
>>
>> My conclusion from this is that not only is there no technical journal
>> specific to archives, but there is also very little interest in one. I feel
>> this is too bad. It is a definite gap in the literature and would provide a
>> mechanism for those of us with some technical expertise to not only help
>> one another, but also help those in the profession who are less technically
>> skilled or have fewer resources to fall back on. But, if there's no
>> interest, there's no interest.
>>
>> Thank you to all who responded.
>>
>> Randall
>>
>>
>> Randall Miles
>> Technical processes archivist
>> *Kheel Center for Labor-Management
>> Documentation and Archives
>> *Martin P. Catherwood Library
>> 227 Ives Hall
>> *ilr* School
>> Cornell University
>> Ithaca, NY 14853-3901
>> Phone: 607-255-2705
>> Fax: 607-255-9641
>> *WEBSITE*: http://www.ilr.cornell.edu/library/kheel/
>> *Blog*: http://programmablearchivist.blogspot.com<
>> http://programmablearchivist.blogspot.com/>
>>
>> */Advancing the world of work/*
>>
>
|