Hugh Paterson III:
> but still I want to know that 44.1/16 was not accurate even
> then (under the auspicious that 44.1/16 was the "best practically
> available" in 2007).
http://www.iasa-web.org/tc04/key-digital-principles
1/ The sampling rate fixes the maximum limit on frequency
response.
2/ The bit depth fixes the dynamic range of an encoded audio
event or item.
Nothing else changes.
44/16 is plenty accurate.
If you do not think that anything above 20 kHz will make a difference.
If you do not think that -93 dBu F/S signal to noise is good enough.
http://drewdaniels.com/audible.pdf
For the following you must have Word Power Point Presentation, PPP,
installed in your computer.
If you do you are in for some very interesting physics explanation how the
ear works and what sampling rate and bits truly means:
http://preview.tinyurl.com/cw88n3w
--
Best regards,
Goran Finnberg
The Mastering Room AB
Goteborg
Sweden
E-mail: [log in to unmask]
Learn from the mistakes of others, you can never live long enough to
make them all yourself. - John Luther
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(") Smurfen:RIP
|