Culbertson, Rebecca <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> At the PCC Ops meeting in 2011, there was strong preference to keep using
> the provider-neutral model for the time being even when all else in a record
> was RDA.
Any word on non-electronic reproductions (photocopies, microfilm,
facsimiles, etc.)?
There was a paper issued by LC(?) a couple years ago on a proposed
move away from LCRI 1.11A and toward AACR2/RDA practice. Though LC
was supposed to have made a decision on this point either before their
RDA Day One announcement or before the day itself, none has been
forthcoming, at least up to now. Will PCC follow LC practice when
it's made? Or forge their own path?
--
Mark K. Ehlert Minitex
Coordinator University of Minnesota
Bibliographic & Technical 15 Andersen Library
Services (BATS) Unit 222 21st Avenue South
Phone: 612-624-0805 Minneapolis, MN 55455-0439
<http://www.minitex.umn.edu/>
|