LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  June 2012

ARSCLIST June 2012

Subject:

Re: Mercury Living Presence

From:

Randy Lane <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 3 Jun 2012 20:50:02 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (171 lines)

I recall some of Dorati's mono Haydn showing up on an obscure label a few
years ago, but a friend who acquired the CDs said they sounded like
LP-derive bootlegs. Well restored releases of those would be of great
interest, as well as some of the Dorati Beethoven from that era.

I wonder if there could be enough interest in some of the artists to
generate some Japanese funded projects. Problem with most of the
Asian markets is an excessive focus on very standard repertory; they never
seem to tire of hearing the same works over and over and over; not much
variety, and opera is almost a bygone comparatively. Just when you thought
the North American and European markets were drowning in complete sets of
the Beethoven Symphonies, the Japanese come along take it to even greater
lengths. Hardly a month goes by with at least 3-4 complete sets being
released, or rereleased, there.

Interest there in Paray, Kubelik, and Dorati could generate some projects.
Probably not much for the likes of Fennell and anson though.

On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>wrote:

> Hi Randy:
>
> There were definitely some CDs yet to be made when Vivendi/Universal
> terminated the project by not renewing my mother's contract at the end of
> 1999. The classical music business was in a bad slump at that point, so
> this wasn't some malicious thing or disagreement, it was "just business,"
> in Godfather terms. In any case, there were definitely a few remaining
> stereo items for which master tapes were accounted for. No more 35mm,
> anything else that was originally released in 35mm and not so on CD, the
> films were lost sometime between the early 60's and 1990. In a few cases
> (most notably the Byron Janis Prokofiev/Rachmaninoff from Moscow),
> 3-channel masters were never found but 2-tracks made at the time of the LP
> cutting were found and used. Keep in mind that the Mercury tapes were
> stored for a time in NY, then warehoused in Chicago, then shipped to
> Holland, where they shufled around, and then many were shipped back here to
> Iron Mountain's storage facility, some by way of Japan. Some were
> mis-labelled, some got wet along the way, all kinds of things, typical of
> megaglomeration of a bunch of companies. A good portion of the budget for
> the project was spent researching and tracking down first-generation tapes.
> In several cases, edited 3-track masters weren't found, but Harold Lawrence
> had kept his edit notes so he could re-edit the "B" machine's reels, which
> had survived all the moving around.
>
> More interesting to me is the mono catalog. I would love to see a bunch of
> that material reissued. There are modern techniques that can clean up
> problems on some early tapes and I think if a dedicated program of
> high-quality transfers of the full-tracks were begun, it just as soon
> encompass all the good stuff. I'd like to see all the mono Hanson back in
> print, plus items like Dorati's mono "Rite of Spring" and Copland 3rd, and
> the Respighi "Church Windows." I'd also like to see the mono "1812" back in
> print, for historical purposes, because it was the best-selling classical
> record from the beginning of the LP era into the 1960's. There are a few
> Kubelik albums that didn't get released because they have very problematic
> tapes but I think modern technology could solve the problems if the budget
> were there. And even though only Dolby-ized dub tapes from the Golden
> Imports exist for the Fennell Gabrieli album, I'd like to see that back in
> print. Also, just because it was a neat album, "The Music of the Bells,"
> recorded at the same time the Riverside Cathedral bells were used for the
> stereo "1812." That album is more a sonic document of bells above busy
> Manhattan circa 1959 than a classical-music album, but the bells are played
> very well. I think there was talk at the time the "1812"/"Wellington's" CD
> was being made of doing a 2CD set that also included the mono "1812" and
> "Music of the Bells," but the budget was used up re-synchronizing and
> re-mixing the weapons and SFX, this time with Wellington's Victory
> perfectly in beat with the score.
>
> There are also a few interesting late 60's Mercury albums made after
> Harold Lawrence departed. The last sessions with the San Antonio Symphony
> netted interesting material, plus Hilde Somer made two interesting Scriabin
> solo-piano records, which I think should be packaged with some sort of DVD
> production similar to the light show she used to put on, per Scriabin's own
> notes and sketches. Evelyn Crochet also made at least one interesting
> solo-piano record, it was released on Philips.
>
> I doubt any of this material will get a proper reissue because there's
> just not a business model for it anymore. Again, it's "just business," no
> underlying malice.
>
> -- Tom Fine
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Randy Lane" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2012 9:01 PM
>
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Mercury Living Presence
>
>
>  How much classical material (expressed as a persentage) would you estimate
>> (Tom) was NOT digitized under the direction of WCF? Is that material, due
>> the required equipment, like "lost" forever now?
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>**
>> wrote:
>>
>>  Carl, you are correct that it was B&W 808's with big amps, I think by
>>> Mark
>>> Levinson, maybe Cello brand? That system got LOUD, like full orchestra in
>>> your face loud. The studio had a nice stereo spread and reliable
>>> soundstage
>>> and frequency response, so the 3-2 mix could be done with reliability and
>>> repeatability. I've described the audio chain before, so I'll just say it
>>> was very direct and there was no DSP stuff after conversion.
>>>
>>> The playback equipment and digital technology used in Germany were
>>> different. I think the SACD's sound like the same tapes played back on a
>>> different machine, not a huge difference in sound (so if you're hearing
>>> one, check your CD player regarding playback of the original CDs) but
>>> more
>>> "solid-statey" compared to playback on an Ampex 300. The first two issues
>>> have "un-Mercury" 3-2 mixes (the 2-channel SACD layer), not enough center
>>> channel in the mix. The last two batches sounded better (more like the
>>> original CDs) in all respects, but I still prefer the CDs because they
>>> are
>>> real-deal Mercury.
>>>
>>> -- Tom Fine
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Carl Pultz" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2012 8:00 PM
>>>
>>> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Mercury Living Presence
>>>
>>>
>>>  At Edison NJ, they had B&W 808s and, iirc, B&W amps and a Cello Audio
>>>
>>>> Pallet
>>>> used as a line amp/switcher - not too shabby.
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
>>>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]****GOV <[log in to unmask]>] On
>>>> Behalf Of Clark Johnsen
>>>> Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2012 1:07 PM
>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Mercury Living Presence
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 11:21 PM, DAVID BURNHAM <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  Why would they not have heard these differences when they issued the
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  CDs?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>  Two possible answers: 1) Recording studio audio systems generally
>>>>> s*ck.
>>>>>
>>>> 2)
>>>> Wishful thinking.
>>>>
>>>> I recall that back in the late Seventies Victor Campos asserted that he
>>>> had
>>>> found a cartridge that made LPs sound "just like the master tapes" (of
>>>> which he owned numerous good copies). That cartridge? A mid-priced Audio
>>>> Technica. Yes.
>>>>
>>>> A couple years later he had a Sonus Blue... much better!
>>>>
>>>> clark
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  Dave b
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager