LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for SF-LIT Archives


SF-LIT Archives

SF-LIT Archives


SF-LIT@C4VLPLISTSERV01.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SF-LIT Home

SF-LIT Home

SF-LIT  June 2012

SF-LIT June 2012

Subject:

Who Watches the Watchman's Watchers

From:

Dennis Fischer <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Science Fiction and Fantasy Listserv <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 31 May 2012 11:05:14 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (115 lines)

Who Watches the Watchmen’s Watchers?
Alan Moore is angry about DC Comics’ Watchmen prequels. He’s right.
By Noah Berlatsky|

Before Watchmen.DC Comics.
Even by the wretched standards of the entertainment industry, superhero comics
are known for their dreadful labor practices. Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster, the
creators of Superman, famously sold the rights to the character to DC Comics for
$130, and spent the latter part of their lives, and virtually all their money,
fighting unsuccessfully to regain control of him. Similarly, Jack Kirby, the
artist who co-created almost the entire roster of Marvel characters, was
systematically stiffed by the company whose fortunes he made. Though most of the
heroes in the Avengers film were Kirby creations, for example, his estate won’t
receive a dime of the film’s $1 billion (and counting) in box office earnings.
In keeping with this depressing tradition, DC will, next week, begin releasing
new comics based on Watchmen, Alan Moore and Dave Gibbon's seminal 1986-87
series. Before Watchmen will include not one, not two, but seven new limited
series, written and drawn by some of DC's most popular creators, including Brian
Azzarello, Darwyn Cooke, Amanda Conner, and Joe Kubert. Watchmen demonstrated to
a mainstream audience that comics could be art, and became one of the most
popular and critically acclaimed comics of the last 25 years. Up to now, it had
also been one of the most sacrosanct. For over two decades, DC has resisted the
urge to publish new material featuring Rorschach, Dr. Manhattan, or the
Comedian. 
You'll notice the list of writers and artists involved with Before Watchmen
includes neither Moore nor Gibbons. This is not unusual in superhero comics.
Most work for DC and Marvel is created on a work-for-hire basis. Thus, the
original creator of, say, Walrus Man will usually go into a deal with one of the
big two comics publishers knowing that the Titan of Tusk will become the
company's property—his aquatic adventures to be written and drawn by whomever
the corporate overlords deem fit.
Advertisement

 
What is unusual, though, is the vehemence with which the original creator has
denounced Before Watchmen. It's true that back in the ’80s, DC tried to get
Moore and Gibbons on board for a sequel. That didn't pan out, though, and in the
ensuing decades, Moore's relationship with DC has soured, to put it mildly.
Among (many) other things, Moore became increasingly angry with the company over
the handling of the rights to Watchmen itself. In the original contract, DC had
written a provision stating that the comic and the characters would revert to
Moore and Gibbons once the series went out of print. Moore had assumed that, as
with all comics in those pre-“graphic novel” days, this would happen within a
few years. Instead, of course, Watchmen was a massive hit—so massive that the
trade paperback collection of Watchmen has been in constant publication, and
probably always will be.
Gibbons has largely seemed content with DC's perpetual ownership of Watchmen.
Moore, though, is a different story. He refused to accept recompense for the
2009 Watchmen film, which he referred to (sight unseen) as "more regurgitated
worms." As for Before Watchmen, he made his position painfully clear in an
interview: "I don't want money. What I want is for this not to happen."
Watchmen's canonical status, combined with Moore's dissent, has led to an
unusually vocal backlash against DC. Chris Roberson, a sometime DC writer,
decided to stop accepting work from the company because of its record on
creator's rights. Cartoonist Roger Langridge, who wrote the acclaimed series
Thor: The Mighty Avenger for Marvel, followed suit, explaining that "Marvel and
DC are turning out to be quite problematic from an ethical point of view to
continue working with." And Bergen Street Comics in Brooklyn will not be
carrying the Before Watchmen titles; in explanation, Bergen Street's manager,
the comics critic Tucker Stone, said, "This is just gross, and we don’t want to
be part of this one."
It would be nice to say that Roberson, Langridge, and Stone are at the forefront
of an all-out revolt against DC and Marvel's business practices. That's not
really the case, though. For the most part, DC and Marvel's writers and artists
are still writing and arting as they always have; comics stores are still
carrying the comics; and fans are still buying. Yes, if you go stumbling about
in the comments of mainstream comics blogs (here for instance), you'll find some
outrage on Moore's behalf. But you'll also find a significant number of folks
who don't care, and who are actively irritated that anyone thinks that maybe
they should care: As one fan said, "Alan Moore is a very arrogant guy that
really hasn't done anything relevant in a very long time and should really spend
more time creating and less being a cranky old guy in a pub.”
J. Michael Straczynski, one of the writers on Before Watchmen, summed things up
for many when he asked rhetorically, “Did Alan Moore get screwed on his
contract? Of course. Lots of people get screwed, but we still have Spider-Man
and lots of other heroes."

Before Watchmen. DC Comics.
Straczynski's contrast between Alan Moore (screwed!) and Spider-Man (still
ours!) nicely sums up the fandom dynamics of superhero comics. Creators are
there to churn out marketable, exploitable properties … and then disappear. And
because the comics companies own the characters, and because they have
substantial marketing departments, they're in a position to make that
disappearance stick. Who knows who created all those different Avengers? Who
knows who created Wonder Woman? Who cares? We want our modern myths packaged and
available at our corner store and on our movie screens. Also … toasters.
Why is Moore complaining? It’s not about the money, as he’s said. (That’s
probably a big part of the reason people call him a crank.) But Moore created a
group of characters and the world they live in; those characters still mean
something to him. Now a company he believes has screwed him over gets to
colonize and even define that world. For example: Moore’s comics have often been
concerned with feminism, and one theme of Watchmen is that the superhero genre
is built in part on retrograde sexual politics and thuggish rape fantasies.
And how does Before Watchmen address these issues? Like so.
If this were some piece of fan fiction detritus—naked Dr. Manhattan, porn-faced
Silk Spectre!—it would be funny. But given that this is an "official" product,
it starts to be harder to laugh it off.
Of course, this is one of the things that always happens with art. If you create
a beloved character or story, others are going to honor it, parody it, use it,
and abuse it. That’s why there’s fan fiction. Indeed, Moore and artist Melinda
Gebbie literally defiled Dorothy Gale, Alice (of Wonderland), and Wendy Darling
in their exuberantly pornographic Lost Girls. Given that, what does Moore have
to complain about exactly?
What he has to complain about is that he doesn't own his own characters ... and
the company that does own them is free to pursue any version of the characters
it likes, whether honoring Moore’s original vision (as DC has been careful to
assert) or turning it into bland, infinitely reproducible genre product (as many
suspect they will). And DC has the marketing might to ensure that, in the end,
its version will be the one that’s remembered. After the third or fourth Before
Watchmen movie, which iteration of the characters will be most familiar to the
public? Rorschach and Nite Owl and Dr. Manhattan have been raised from their
resting place, and Moore—and the rest of us—now get to watch them stagger
around, dripping bits of themselves across the decades, until everyone has
utterly forgotten that they ever had souls.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager