LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for BIBFRAME Archives


BIBFRAME Archives

BIBFRAME Archives


BIBFRAME@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BIBFRAME Home

BIBFRAME Home

BIBFRAME  June 2012

BIBFRAME June 2012

Subject:

Re: Latest brilliant idea (fwd)

From:

Bernhard Eversberg <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative Forum <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 4 Jun 2012 09:29:08 +0200

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (54 lines)

04.06.2012 04:21, Simon Spero:
>
> Eric Miller <http://zepheira.com/about/people/eric-miller/> "[...] is
> co-founder and president of Zepheira [...] Previously, Eric was a [...]
> Research Scientist at OCLC in Dublin, Ohio".   I believe that 8 years at
> OCLC is a sufficient period of time to allow one to gain some
> familiarity with libraries.

The LC press release does indeed say:
A major goal of BFTI is to replace the MARC 21 exchange format with a
new Linked Data model ...

I just wonder if this is even conceptually possible. More precisely:
Can a MARC record be replaced by a set of Linked Data triples? How could
the data exchange then actually work? Exchange, up until now, is based
on records. So what would replace them - or is the new idea and the
intention now to make the very concept of the bibliographic record
obsolete? What does that mean for ILSs that used to receive MARC 
records? What will it mean for the processes of cataloging and the
catalogers' user interface?
OK, there may be features of MARC that need not be dealt with since
they are obsolete or useless in other ways. Yet, would leaving these out
make triplification any easier?

But the LC statement, I think, may also be read as calling for an
addition or enhancement for MARC, not its wholesale replacement.
For the press release statement goes on to say

... while retaining as much as possible the robust and beneficial
aspects of the historical format.
See
   http://www.loc.gov/marc/transition/news/modeling-052212.html

And this will indeed - if I'm not entirely misinformed - not be
possible with the Linked Data concept and triplestores alone.

What one might envision is something like this:

1. In regular MARC records, add something like the subfield $0 or $w
    to those fields that need to be linked to authority records or
    other bib records, each containing a URI  XYZ.

2. Set up a central triplestore for the authority data allowing to be
    queried for XYZ to yield the information necessary to enhance the
    MARC record at that particular point, say, with information about
    the person or subject heading.

3. OPACs may then use that remote triplestore to enhance their
    record displays without the need to restructure their MARC records
    into an entirely new way, except adding those URIs or constructing
    them from existing data on demand.

B.Eversberg

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
July 2011
June 2011

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager