I was suggesting that AFTER the album number, the work should have the
composer's name first.
Steve Smolian
-----Original Message-----
From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Sam Brylawski
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 1:53 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Update to Columbia Masterworks Discography
Congratulations on this. For the record(s), I disagree with my esteemed
colleagues about arranging by composer names. This is a label discography so
the arrangement in album set order seems very logical to me. That said, a
composer/works index would be very useful.
Sam Brylawski
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Sam <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> After a lot of edits, changes and additions, I'd like to draw members
attention to my almost complete discography of the Columbia Masterworks
78rpm Albums - which indexes the M, X, OP, J, D, S and Modern Masters
series.
>
> Although not complete, it is by far the most comprehensive document of its
type. It nears almost 450 pages and covers each recording in detail.
> I'm in the process of completing the matrix numbers.
>
> Please note - it is a DRAFT ONLY and will contain errors and will
ultimately need a very thorough edit - so please view it, with this in mind.
>
> This has been a labor of love - three years later and I've got it to a
manageable read. Members may wish to bookmark it.
> It may be of some use to some.
>
>
> Your comments, edits, omissions and/or corrections are always most
welcome.
>
> You can access the document online at:
> http://www.78rpmcommunity.com/documents/2/44/columbia-masterworks-78rp
> m-discography-v2-1
>
> Sam Hopper
|