Hello,

Are there any plans to include MARC field 245 subfield $s in the
transformation stylesheet for MARCXML to MODS?

We are currently mapping a set of data for inclusion in our catalogue and
are in two minds as to whether to place information regarding the version of
the videotape (e.g. transmission copy) in 245$s or a 500 note field.   I’ve
converted a record which has $s in it but noticed that this is lost during
transformation.  We would need to retain this information in the MODS within
METS and therefore if there are no plans to include the 245$s in the
transformation then we would need to make sure that it is included in a 500
note field.

Thanks,
Vicky