LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


[email protected]


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  August 2012

ARSCLIST August 2012

Subject:

Re: archiving slide-tape shows (was voca-film technology)

From:

John Schroth <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 7 Aug 2012 01:21:21 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (126 lines)

Hi Mike:

No, Unfortunately the Eastman House is not doing anything regarding 
archiving these types of programs. I think for several very 
understandable reasons:

A huge percentage of these programs were proprietary - used for huge 
sales meetings and trade shows to release new product lines to sales 
people within the company or distributors. Like Apple releasing the 
first Macintosh with a program called "Blue Busters" (a takeoff on Ghost 
Busters - Apple busting "Big Blue" aka IBM), or Saab releasing the new 
(back then) 900 line, titled "Saab 900". Since many of the really big 
budget shows were for corporate presentation, it would be tough to get 
companies to release these privately owned programs.

How many people are really interested in preserving them? I for one 
would be, but I'm in the small minority. There is not a lot of money to 
be recouped from trying to preserve a multi-image slide presentation. 
The funds at many institutions are very tight. When money does become 
available it is most often used for preservation of high-brow or more 
well-known media that a large percentage or people can identify with, 
know about, and would be interested in helping to support, or paying 
money to see, or is viewed by people as a more valuable or important asset.

How do you recreate a multi-image program digitally and project it with 
the same effect, the look would really not be the same. Also, part of 
the wonder of watching a multi-image slide presentation is watching all 
those projectors firing away, hearing the clicking of the advancing 
slides and just shaking your head thinking how mad it was that it even 
worked.

The few programs of note that would be worth taking a stab at 
resurrecting and preserving are in rough shape. I've talked to many of 
the old "well known" producers and owners of the past large production 
companies. The few shows they have kept are stored in garages and old 
warehouses. Mothballed away because they were so significant at the time 
and cost so much to produce that the people who produced them, loved 
them, and could not see throwing them out. But in most cases they did 
not store them properly. Fading and mold would be just a couple of the 
issues facing poorly stored slides.

Richard mentions "The New York Experience". I remember seeing this 
program with my dad, then going back to see the projectors all firing 
away and watched in wonder. My dad was with Kodak for 35 years in the 
motion picture/audiovisual division and worked with people who produced 
such programs. Also Richard mentioned some great presentations used at 
National Parks. Kodak also produced many widescreen multi-image programs 
that were glorious wonders of photography and took you all over the 
world. These were used as promotional image pieces and toured the globe 
helping to promote Kodak. Donna Lawrence productions produced an amazing 
360 degree slide presentation that ran as a fixed display for the 
Kentucky Derby at Churchill Downs. There was even a 24 projector show 
that ran as a fixed display on the Queen Elizabeth II (I have one of the 
slide projectors taken from the ship before the Cunard line retired 
her). All of these are noteworthy and would be worth preservation, but 
they were either fixed displays or touring displays. Even if a working 
copy was available, the slides got to a point of being so faded that 
they would be hard to bring back to their former full-color glory 
without a lot of work. And I wonder how many surviving audio tapes used 
to run the programs would have been in even decent shape.

AMI - the Association for Multi-Image, which I was a member of for many 
years before it went defunct, had a national competition every year. 
Shows from all over the world were submitted. Any shows that won awards 
had Ariel Image transfers made of them to share with anyone in the AMI 
community who wanted to rent them out. This would be worth investigating 
to see who were the leaders of the organization prior to closing up 
shop, and who had the tape masters of the shows. Could they be had and 
if so, make arrangements to get them converted to digital format. At 
least the stories and the content could be saved. Several years back at 
my 25th reunion, there was talk of doing just that, but everyone got 
busy and nothing became of it. I'd still think I'd like to pursue this 
and should. I'm glad this posting came about so that I can again put 
this up a front burner.

As a side note, many of these shows could be classified as moving image 
presentations. Many times we used a fat back that held a large roll of 
35mm slide film on a Nikon 35mm still camera with a motor drive, to 
shoot moving image sequences. When you cycle these sequences these 
through 15 or more slide projectors - the likeness of motion picture 
film movement is close, with a different effect, but still amazing (and 
much cheaper than hiring a film crew and the equipment).

I have a collection of these shows that I will post on Vimeo sometime in 
the next week or so for anyone that is interested. They were originally 
mastered on 1", then dubbed down to 3/4"-U. Copies were made and sent 
out on 3/4"-U dubs. I quickly copied these to VHS whenever they came in 
- so the quality is far from perfect, but it gives you at least an idea 
of how neat these shows really were.

Kind Regards,

John Schroth
Media Transfer Service, LLC

On 8/6/2012 1:39 PM, Michael Biel wrote:
> From: John Schroth <[log in to unmask]>
>
>> I majored in Multi-image slide presentation at RIT over 25 years ago.
>> They had a core-curriculum in Multi-Image slide production, the only one
>> like it in country at the time.
> Wow!  In this thread we have really hit on a nearly forgotten format for
> archiving, and your info and expertise is valuable.  Is Eastman House
> doing anything on this?  I think this topic is worthy of an ARSC
> Conference presentation -- not sure if the Moving Image organizations
> are interested in these non-moving image presentations.  I remember the
> ones I've seen being very impressive -- but every time a movie was
> inserted, the combination of the noticeably lower resolution and the
> disruption of looking at lengthy-held still images reduced the effect.
> These programs could be reproduced with the superior HDTV projection now
> available, using multiple projectors and screens of course.  There
> should be an effort to do it NOW while we still have people like you
> that remember the equipment and programming so it can be converted to
> computer controlling.
>
> Mike Biel  [log in to unmask]
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2012.0.2196 / Virus Database: 2437/5181 - Release Date: 08/06/12
>
>
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager