Ahhh yes - I totally forgot the "video wall".
I was programming them back in the late 80's and early 90's. If I
remember right there were two companies that made software and
sophisticated switching devices for these. The one I knew how to program
was made by Pic-Block. I remember doing the programming for NASA several
years in a row for the booth they had at the annual airshow in Oshkosh.
They'd set me up in a huge hanger outside Cleveland with all the
equipment ready. Three days later we had a show programmed. The ones I
worked on had up to three laser disk players running at the same time
for the video feed. Laser disk players were used as they had a very
clean feed, would not wear out like tape when played over and over and
allowed almost instant access to any point on the disk. The hardware
also had a still-store so that you could grab an image and hold it on
the monitor, thus having a different scene on each monitor. You could
display a single image on each monitor, or multiple images blown up and
spread across groups of monitors in any combination. Neat stuff.
Regards,
John Schroth
On 8/7/2012 9:59 AM, Tom Fine wrote:
> Hi John:
>
> Any place that worked with corporate/commercial clients was riding
> that wave in those days. You guys in previous posts have cited some of
> the miriad corporate and educational presentations that were made over
> the years. Plus this stuff was huge with amusement parks and tourist
> attactions.
>
> There was also a whole element of multi-source sound to all of this.
> One good example is the 14-channel system Ampex made for Knott's Berry
> Farm:
> http://www.ilk.org/~ppk/Manuals/Ampex_Case_Histories/Ampex%2014-channel%20AG-300%20case%20history.pdf
>
>
> Also, using mult-track tape to run light cues and even motorized
> moving 3-D objects/displays. I'm thinking specifically of the
> Cyclorama at Gettysburg and more elaborate museum displays I've seen
> over the years.
>
> There was also a trend in the 80's and 90's to have wall-sized banks
> of NTSC TV monitors with different source video elements making up a
> large-screen whole, used both by artists and commercial/corporate and
> entertainment multimedia. Now how would one preserve THAT sort of
> thing? I guess you could do it today as digital picture-within-picture
> stuff on mega-displays or projection systems?
>
> -- Tom Fine
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Schroth"
> <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 9:28 AM
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] archiving slide-tape shows (was voca-film
> technology)
>
>
>> Tom very nice. I'm impressed with the videos from AAV and that your
>> dad was so heavily involved there. He was riding the AV wave back then.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> John Schroth
>>
>> On 8/7/2012 7:45 AM, Tom Fine wrote:
>>> This is a very interesting YouTube channel.
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/user/EamesOffice
>>>
>>> This one seems to be a film of a multi-screen slide/film show.
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ob0aSyDUK4A&feature=plcp
>>>
>>> That's one (primative) way of preserving it as it was presented.
>>>
>>> I too remember "The New York Experience," I think I was pre-teen
>>> when we saw that.
>>>
>>> My father was involved in a few of these productions. He did sound
>>> design and mixing for several of the large-scale things at the
>>> 1964-65 World's Fair and also Expo67. I think some of them involved
>>> multiple film and still image elements. He also did the sound design
>>> and mix for the interactive multimedia Ford's Theatre "historical
>>> drama" thing in the 70's (I have an opening night program somewhere
>>> but don't recall going to it as a little kid).
>>>
>>> Here's another YouTube:
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJqutj9Usjw
>>> this is a promo film made for the Armstrong Audio-Video complex in
>>> Melbourne, Australia, circa 1974. My father designed it, oversaw
>>> construction and ran it for the first year. Note the extensive
>>> multi-media facilities. This was when color TV was new to Australia,
>>> so the facility was state of the art then. Apparently, musician
>>> Brian Cadd was popular down under back then.
>>>
>>> Here's another look at AAV, the video montage from the grand opening
>>> gala:
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMwZWLPpcFM
>>> this one features heavy use of the Rutt-Etra video synthesizer,
>>> which was a new toy back then.
>>> By the way, can anyone positively identify the recording console and
>>> 24-track tape machine types? That's an Ampex AG-440B 4-track in the
>>> small production studio.
>>>
>>> Back squarely on-topic, AAV was involved in many of the typical
>>> mid-70's corporate and entertainment multi-media productions. I
>>> think that era was pretty much the heyday of that sort of thing,
>>> worldwide.
>>>
>>> -- Tom Fine
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Schroth"
>>> <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 1:21 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] archiving slide-tape shows (was voca-film
>>> technology)
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi Mike:
>>>>
>>>> No, Unfortunately the Eastman House is not doing anything regarding
>>>> archiving these types of programs. I think for several very
>>>> understandable reasons:
>>>>
>>>> A huge percentage of these programs were proprietary - used for
>>>> huge sales meetings and trade shows to release new product lines to
>>>> sales people within the company or distributors. Like Apple
>>>> releasing the first Macintosh with a program called "Blue Busters"
>>>> (a takeoff on Ghost Busters - Apple busting "Big Blue" aka IBM), or
>>>> Saab releasing the new (back then) 900 line, titled "Saab 900".
>>>> Since many of the really big budget shows were for corporate
>>>> presentation, it would be tough to get companies to release these
>>>> privately owned programs.
>>>>
>>>> How many people are really interested in preserving them? I for one
>>>> would be, but I'm in the small minority. There is not a lot of
>>>> money to be recouped from trying to preserve a multi-image slide
>>>> presentation. The funds at many institutions are very tight. When
>>>> money does become available it is most often used for preservation
>>>> of high-brow or more well-known media that a large percentage or
>>>> people can identify with, know about, and would be interested in
>>>> helping to support, or paying money to see, or is viewed by people
>>>> as a more valuable or important asset.
>>>>
>>>> How do you recreate a multi-image program digitally and project it
>>>> with the same effect, the look would really not be the same. Also,
>>>> part of the wonder of watching a multi-image slide presentation is
>>>> watching all those projectors firing away, hearing the clicking of
>>>> the advancing slides and just shaking your head thinking how mad it
>>>> was that it even worked.
>>>>
>>>> The few programs of note that would be worth taking a stab at
>>>> resurrecting and preserving are in rough shape. I've talked to many
>>>> of the old "well known" producers and owners of the past large
>>>> production companies. The few shows they have kept are stored in
>>>> garages and old warehouses. Mothballed away because they were so
>>>> significant at the time and cost so much to produce that the people
>>>> who produced them, loved them, and could not see throwing them out.
>>>> But in most cases they did not store them properly. Fading and mold
>>>> would be just a couple of the issues facing poorly stored slides.
>>>>
>>>> Richard mentions "The New York Experience". I remember seeing this
>>>> program with my dad, then going back to see the projectors all
>>>> firing away and watched in wonder. My dad was with Kodak for 35
>>>> years in the motion picture/audiovisual division and worked with
>>>> people who produced such programs. Also Richard mentioned some
>>>> great presentations used at National Parks. Kodak also produced
>>>> many widescreen multi-image programs that were glorious wonders of
>>>> photography and took you all over the world. These were used as
>>>> promotional image pieces and toured the globe helping to promote
>>>> Kodak. Donna Lawrence productions produced an amazing 360 degree
>>>> slide presentation that ran as a fixed display for the Kentucky
>>>> Derby at Churchill Downs. There was even a 24 projector show that
>>>> ran as a fixed display on the Queen Elizabeth II (I have one of the
>>>> slide projectors taken from the ship before the Cunard line retired
>>>> her). All of these are noteworthy and would be worth preservation,
>>>> but they were either fixed displays or touring displays. Even if a
>>>> working copy was available, the slides got to a point of being so
>>>> faded that they would be hard to bring back to their former
>>>> full-color glory without a lot of work. And I wonder how many
>>>> surviving audio tapes used to run the programs would have been in
>>>> even decent shape.
>>>>
>>>> AMI - the Association for Multi-Image, which I was a member of for
>>>> many years before it went defunct, had a national competition every
>>>> year. Shows from all over the world were submitted. Any shows that
>>>> won awards had Ariel Image transfers made of them to share with
>>>> anyone in the AMI community who wanted to rent them out. This would
>>>> be worth investigating to see who were the leaders of the
>>>> organization prior to closing up shop, and who had the tape masters
>>>> of the shows. Could they be had and if so, make arrangements to get
>>>> them converted to digital format. At least the stories and the
>>>> content could be saved. Several years back at my 25th reunion,
>>>> there was talk of doing just that, but everyone got busy and
>>>> nothing became of it. I'd still think I'd like to pursue this and
>>>> should. I'm glad this posting came about so that I can again put
>>>> this up a front burner.
>>>>
>>>> As a side note, many of these shows could be classified as moving
>>>> image presentations. Many times we used a fat back that held a
>>>> large roll of 35mm slide film on a Nikon 35mm still camera with a
>>>> motor drive, to shoot moving image sequences. When you cycle these
>>>> sequences these through 15 or more slide projectors - the likeness
>>>> of motion picture film movement is close, with a different effect,
>>>> but still amazing (and much cheaper than hiring a film crew and the
>>>> equipment).
>>>>
>>>> I have a collection of these shows that I will post on Vimeo
>>>> sometime in the next week or so for anyone that is interested. They
>>>> were originally mastered on 1", then dubbed down to 3/4"-U. Copies
>>>> were made and sent out on 3/4"-U dubs. I quickly copied these to
>>>> VHS whenever they came in - so the quality is far from perfect, but
>>>> it gives you at least an idea of how neat these shows really were.
>>>>
>>>> Kind Regards,
>>>>
>>>> John Schroth
>>>> Media Transfer Service, LLC
>>>>
>>>> On 8/6/2012 1:39 PM, Michael Biel wrote:
>>>>> From: John Schroth <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>
>>>>>> I majored in Multi-image slide presentation at RIT over 25 years
>>>>>> ago.
>>>>>> They had a core-curriculum in Multi-Image slide production, the
>>>>>> only one
>>>>>> like it in country at the time.
>>>>> Wow! In this thread we have really hit on a nearly forgotten
>>>>> format for
>>>>> archiving, and your info and expertise is valuable. Is Eastman House
>>>>> doing anything on this? I think this topic is worthy of an ARSC
>>>>> Conference presentation -- not sure if the Moving Image organizations
>>>>> are interested in these non-moving image presentations. I
>>>>> remember the
>>>>> ones I've seen being very impressive -- but every time a movie was
>>>>> inserted, the combination of the noticeably lower resolution and the
>>>>> disruption of looking at lengthy-held still images reduced the
>>>>> effect.
>>>>> These programs could be reproduced with the superior HDTV
>>>>> projection now
>>>>> available, using multiple projectors and screens of course. There
>>>>> should be an effort to do it NOW while we still have people like you
>>>>> that remember the equipment and programming so it can be converted to
>>>>> computer controlling.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mike Biel [log in to unmask]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----
>>>>> No virus found in this message.
>>>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>>>> Version: 2012.0.2196 / Virus Database: 2437/5181 - Release Date:
>>>>> 08/06/12
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----
>>> No virus found in this message.
>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>> Version: 2012.0.2196 / Virus Database: 2437/5181 - Release Date:
>>> 08/06/12
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2012.0.2196 / Virus Database: 2437/5183 - Release Date: 08/07/12
>
>
|