LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


[email protected]


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  August 2012

ARSCLIST August 2012

Subject:

Re: Digital History Query

From:

David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 7 Aug 2012 17:23:32 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (78 lines)

I remember 2" commercial video, which was on a reel. Never seen 2" Beta,
but they describe it in the article I provided the link to.
I don't think it was a format that was in the market apart from high end
commercial use, and maybe not in the US at all.

UD

On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 5:14 PM, [log in to unmask] <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> I am unfamiliar with 2" Betamax. I've only seen 1/2". Did I miss something?
>
> joe salerno
>
>
>
> On 8/7/2012 4:03 PM, David Lewis wrote:
>
>> Found a remaindered copy of a later Epic CD incarntaion of "Cheap Trick at
>> Budokan" which I have been listening to in the car. Apart from the fact
>> that I feel that
>> it is one of the best albums ever to go triple-platinum, there are some
>> questions about its recording that I'm hoping the combined wisdom here
>> might help illuminate.
>>
>> When the import release arrived in the little store that was my haunt in
>> late 1978 there were several things about it that were waaaaay unusual.
>> The
>> quality of the
>> photography -- even though shot in the dark, and somewhat enhanced because
>> of that -- and of the album jacket printing was a king's mile above the
>> average, and
>> the later US version kind of darkened and blurred both by comparison.
>> However, the sound of the disc was realistic in a way I had never before
>> experienced; it was
>> so good that it still took me additional years to notice that the music
>> was
>> good also.
>>
>> The earlier LP versions stated that "Cheap Trick at Budokan" was in SONY
>> STEREO. I remember a record store clerk excitedly telling me that Sony
>> stereo was
>> better than regular stereo and my bullcrap detector going off as a result.
>> Now, though, I wonder if he was in some way -- correct?
>>
>> Is it possible that digital was somewhere in the chain of "Cheap Trick at
>> Budokan." Historically it is possible:
>>
>> http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/**CorporateInfo/History/**
>> SonyHistory/2-07.html<http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/CorporateInfo/History/SonyHistory/2-07.html>
>>
>> The PCM-1 was in use and already being marketed by April of 1978 when
>> the Budokan concerts were recorded. At that time, Sony was using 2"
>> Betamax
>> tapes;
>> the disc was being developed, but was not putting out acceptable results
>> yet as either a recording or playback format. However, April 1978 is a bit
>> before the
>> fateful meeting with Karajan mentioned in this corporate history.
>>
>> In my car, the recording sounds digital, but it is after all being played
>> back from a CD. Elsewhere I've read that the first digital recording in
>> the
>> US was the Zubin
>> Mehta/NYP recording of Stravinsky's "Petrushka" from June 1979. But I also
>> recall that Fleetwood Mac's album "Tusk" was at least partly digital and
>> it
>> was on the
>> market by the fall of '79. That was on the WB, not CBS.
>>
>> Uncle Dave Lewis
>> Lebanon, OH
>>
>>
> --
> Joe Salerno
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Error during command authentication.

Error - unable to initiate communication with LISTSERV (errno=111). The server is probably not started.

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager