LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for BIBFRAME Archives


BIBFRAME Archives

BIBFRAME Archives


BIBFRAME@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BIBFRAME Home

BIBFRAME Home

BIBFRAME  August 2012

BIBFRAME August 2012

Subject:

Re: MARC usage statistics

From:

Juha Hakala <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative Forum <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 8 Aug 2012 08:50:16 +0300

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (64 lines)

Hello,

After Germany abandoned MAB in favour of MARC 21 there is just one 
European country left which uses a non-MARC cataloguing format, the 
Netherlands. Both the Dutch and the Germans developed their national 
formats in late 60s / early 70s; at least in the Netherlands the 
solution was meant to be an intermediate one.

The Dutch national cataloguing format is not much of a problem for the 
libraries which are using the Pica system, since the data is stored 
internally in Picamarc, from which it is possible to produce both MARC 
21 and the national format.

There has been quite a few national MARC-based cataloguing formats in 
Europe. UKMARC started the trend, and after that there were countries 
who used UKMARC as the basis for their national formats. FINMARC, which 
is still in use in some libraries although MARC 21 has been the national 
cataloguing format for years, is an example of this. Mid-70s, when 
FINMARC was built, we compared USMARC and UKMARC, and chose the latter 
for all the usual reasons (no punctuation embedded in data, for instance).

Some of these national formats are still alive and kicking, danMARC 
being perhaps the prime example. There are also a few European countries 
where UNIMARC is popular.

Regarding Will's question, an integrated library system that cannot 
ingest or export data in some variant of MARC would not and should not 
become popular anywhere in the world. It is probably impossible to make 
an exhaustive list of systems which support MARC one way or another, or 
estimate the number of libraries that utilize MARC-based systems.

Best regards,

Juha

On 8.8.2012 3:56, J. McRee Elrod wrote:
> Amy Turner asked:
>
>> Is MARC less common on the other side of the pond?
>
> Based on our experience with British clients, MARC21 is gradually
> replacing UKMARC.  Our only remaining UKMARC client just cancelled. We
> have an Irish client who still wants 440, but we are declining.
>
> While some systems we support do not use MARC internally, we have had
> only one client since 1979 whose system could not import MARC.  We did
> a crosswalk for them to their nonMARC system, e.g., all authors (100,
> 700s) were in one field with demarcations between them; ditto
> subjects.
>
>
>     __       __   J. McRee (Mac) Elrod ([log in to unmask])
>    {__  |   /     Special Libraries Cataloguing   HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
>    ___} |__ \__________________________________________________________

-- 

  Juha Hakala
  Senior advisor, standardisation and IT

  The National Library of Finland
  P.O.Box 15 (Unioninkatu 36, room 503), FIN-00014 Helsinki University
  Email [log in to unmask], tel +358 50 382 7678

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
July 2011
June 2011

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager