Here is cleaner version of the very same take:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Carl Pultz" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2012 3:08 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Why Does Take 1 of Jimmy Lunceford's "White Heat"
Sound This Way?
> There's a lot going on there Dave, with the stereo LP dub adding some
> artifacts. Do you mean the scrape-sounds that are modulated by loud peaks
> the sort of slap-back effect, most noticeable on the drums? Might help to
> hear take 2.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Lewis
> Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2012 8:11 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [ARSCLIST] Why Does Take 1 of Jimmy Lunceford's "White Heat"
> This Way?
> I have parked a file of it here:
> This comes from X LP LX 3002, which was issued in 1953. It is not one of
> Ethel Gabriel's enthusiastically skewered "simulated stereo" remixes, but
> this weird flanging effect is in the mono original.
> I used to have a buff Bluebird that had this very take on it, and when I
> listened to it, I would think "What in the world.....??"
> It sounds like it could have been the result of two mikes out of phase, or
> two takes cut into the same platter, but if that was the case you'd hear
> artifacts in the trumpet solo, not the case here. There
> is a more common take 2 that sounds normal. Mx. is BS-81324 according to
> the jacket notes of LX 3002, recorded 1-26-1934.
> Uncle Dave Lewis
> Lebanon, OH