Hey Tom,

I even received a notice yesterday of being kicked off the list because my
email address was giving them problems and I'm only posting like 2 or 3
times a year! Had to rejoin using another address.

- Blake

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Fine" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 6:25 AM
Subject: [ARSCLIST] ARSC List problems


> Several people have been thrown off ARSC List for "repeated rejected
> postings" even though their postings have made it. I'm waiting for this to
> happen to me because I get a rejection notice every other posting or so.
> Also, I get repeats of most messages posted to the ARSC List, not all but
> most. It seems to be a series of random or periodic problems. Ghost in the
> machine? DHS messing with another government computer? What?
>
> -- Tom Fine
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Richard L. Hess" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 1:04 AM
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Sheet Music was Photos of The Colony NYC
>
>
>> You have somehow set your REPLY-TO property in your email client to your
>> thorenstd124 address at yahoo.com.
>>
>> When I went to reply just now, I just got your address. Doesn't happen
>> with many other people anymore since we discussed it a couple of months
>> ago.
>>
>> You will need to find in your settings how you are adding a REPLY-TO
>> header to your emails which appears to be causing the issue. We can't
>> help you as it's at your end.
>>
>> There appear to be OTHER ISSUES with ARSC-LIST again, but this is not
>> related as far as I can see.
>>
>> I was able to get the list email as a CC in this message because I did a
>> REPLY-ALL. That's why you're getting a direct copy and one via the list.
>>
>> Here is a copy of a PORTION of your headers from the message I am
>> replying to. Note the Reply-To header that your software put in.
>> Otherwise, if there is no Reply-To header, ARSC-LIST munges it and makes
>> it ARSC-LIST, which is not considered best practice from what I've read,
>> but c'est la vie.
>>
>>> Message-ID:
>>> <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 21:42:40 -0700
>>> Reply-To: Roger Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sender: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
>>> <[log in to unmask]>
>>> From: Roger Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Sheet Music was Photos of The Colony NYC
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Richard
>>
>>
>> On 2012-09-21 12:42 AM, Roger Kulp wrote:
>>> Does anybo
>>> How would I know THAT?More importantly,how do I correct it?
>>>
>>> Does anybody else have this problem?
>>>
>>> Roger
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>> From: Michael Biel <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 12:34 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Sheet Music was Photos of The Colony NYC
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Sheet Music was Photos of The Colony NYC
>>> From: Roger Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Date: Wed, September 19, 2012 11:29 pm
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>
>>>> When I send the emails,it says it goes to the list.
>>>> The list address is in the "TO" box,just like it is now!
>>> That's not what we are talking about. When WE hit reply for one of YOUR
>>> messages, it is YOUR ADDRESS that shows up in OUR TO box, not the list.
>>> Your messages are the ones that are screwed up. I bet if you hit reply
>>> to one of your own messages (not this one, one of YOURS) you would find
>>> your own address in the TO box.
>>>
>>> Mike Biel [log in to unmask]
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>> From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 7:49 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Sheet Music was Photos of The Colony NYC
>>>
>>> ROGER - PLEASE FIX THE REPLY ADDRESS PROBLEM!!!
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Richard L. Hess email: [log in to unmask]
>> Aurora, Ontario, Canada (905) 713 6733 1-877-TAPE-FIX
>> http://www.richardhess.com/tape/contact.htm
>> Quality tape transfers -- even from hard-to-play tapes.
>>