LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  September 2012

ARSCLIST September 2012

Subject:

Re: 35mm slide scanner -- what's good these days?

From:

Randy Lane <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 18 Sep 2012 06:21:40 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (74 lines)

A Nikon Coolscan 5000 is your best bet. It is really the only one to ever
have an optional slide feeder, which will cost you an extra $300-500.
Expensive, yes. But, they hold their value. Buy one, even used, slide your
clooection, then resell it and you likely have very little if any loss -
you may even sell it for more than you paid. The CoolScan 4000 will work
also, but you MUST have a firewire port, as it does not support USB.

There is also the flatbed option, for which slide holders capable of batch
scanning up to 15 slides are available. My recommendation there is the
Epson Perfection V700 or V750. Like the Nikon, both of those come with
Digital Ice infrared scatch removal - a critical element as even the best
slides have imperfections. Infrared scratch removal examines the surface of
rthe slide itself for imperfections. Other solutions examine the photo
itself to determine what is a scratch; with those solutions many items
meant to be in the picture get mistaken for scratches or dust.

One other recommendation - do NOT use the bundled software that comes
withthe scanner, even SilverFast. Get VueScan (
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html ). I am the restoration artist in you Tom
will be much much happier with this software. You've used enough audio
restoration software to know that the easiest/simplest solution most always
produces poor quality, unwanted distortions, and more. Like better audio
restoration software, VueScan has a learning curve, but the results are
well worth the effort. And, very importantly, VueScan lets you save the
"RAW" scanned information without applying any correction effects, much
like you would first record an LP and save the raw unretouched audio file
separate from that which you apply restorative effects to later. My
workflow with VueScan involves starting  the raw scan, usually in batch
mode as you've expressed a desire for, set to save the results to a file
that inculdes teh infrared data embedded in the file. VueScan can then, one
at a time with you at the helm, reload each file and apply color balancing,
scratch removal, etc (the equivalent of DSP) and see the reults before
saving you final file. The raw scan file can be saved and reprocessed at a
later time (no scanner neessary, just VueScan) should you desire to revisit
the it to apply the digital effect a little differently.


On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 4:49 AM, Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>wrote:

> Hi All:
>
> This kinda relates to ARSC because I'm sure all of us have dabbled in
> multi-media at one point or another.
>
> I have a bunch of 35mm slides I'd like to digitize. They are all good
> condition and almost all are Kodachrome or whatever the film type was that
> holds color and doesn't fade. So they are vivid and not scratched or dirty,
> despite being 50-60 years old.
>
> Back the last time I thought about this, years ago, a Nikon scanner with
> an auto-feed mechanism cost a small fortune and took several minutes per
> slide (this was back in the early Pentium IV days). I have a faster
> computer now (Dell Precision Workstation T3400 with loads of memory and
> fast hard drives), and am wondering what the recommended hardware options
> are. I'm not wedded to Nikon, but I do want a solid scanner with an
> excellent auto-feed mechanism. I'd love to load in a few dozen slides and
> set-and-forget, with the scanner software writing some sort of non-lossy
> format (PSD, TIFF or something else). I'll then look at the results in my
> image-viewing software and decide which warrant further Photoshop work.
> Ideally, the scanner would be unlike my Epson large-format scanner in that
> it turns out a nicely contrasted/nicely-color-**balanced image from the
> getgo and doesn't require Photoshop in most cases.
>
> I notice there are a variety of slide scanners on the market, varying
> widely in price. I don't have to go dirt-cheap, but I want value if I pay
> extra, not just a brand name. I need "good quality personal-use strength"
> not "industrial strength." Total project will be a few hundred slides, not
> thousands and not intending to use this thing every day for years.
>
> Recommendations appreciated. Thanks in advance!
>
> -- Tom Fine
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager