As far as electrically-recorded optical sound film goes, the earl
As far as electrically-recorded optical sound film goes, the earliest I can think of are the Theodore Case/E. I. Sponable "Miss Manila Martin and Her Pet Squirrel" test from 1921, and some of the early De Forrest Phonofilms from 1923 exist. Some extensive footage from the Case Research Labs and De Forrest exist from the '24-'26 period. I know some Tri-Ergon tests also exist, but I don't know what the dates on them are.
From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Monday, October 8, 2012 3:42 PM
Subject: [ARSCLIST] Early electrical disk recording
This brings up a question -- what is the earliest commercially-released electrically-recorded
Also, what is the oldest surviving test recording of an electrical system? Something from WECO? From
GE (the optical-film system)?
Is any of the pre-commercial electrically-recorded material online?
-- Tom Fine
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Stamler" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 3:25 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Howard Scott Dies
> On 10/8/2012 11:36 AM, Mickey Clark wrote:
>> I have electrical issues on Columbia as early as January 1925- by Art
>> Gillham and The Associated Glee Clubs of America waxed electrically by
>> March. I've issued discs by both these artists - Mickey
> And I transcribed a couple of Irish records, both by the same artist, recorded a few weeks apart,
> onw acoustic, one electric. Again, early 1925.
> But according to the information I've read, Western Electric first approached Victor in late 1923
> or early 1924, and Columbia shortly after. It took the two companies a year (and a disastrous
> Christmas sales season) to decide they would adopt the new system.
>> Follow me on Twitter
>> M.C.Productions Vintage Recordings
>> 710 Westminster Ave. West
>> Penticton BC
>> V2A 1K8
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Lewis" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 8:45 AM
>> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Howard Scott Dies
>>> In all due respect, while Victor and Columbia readily embraced electric
>>> recording, the smaller labels did resist, mainly as they didn't have the
>>> capital resources to make the switch.
>>> Brunswick had it's "light ray" process which, though a mystery, seems to
>>> have been used by others as well as a way to dodge the equipment upgrade
>>> and hefty licensing fees.
>>> Gennett's electrical system, such as it was, was terrible sounding at
>>> first. You would think that Marsh Labs, with its earlier, inferior
>>> electrical system, would have prospered as a
>>> result. But it didn't. Homer Rodeheaver closed his own acoustic studio in
>>> Chicago in the fall of 1925 rather than to upgrade. I think BD&M went
>>> route also.
>>> There was a little economic slump in 1925-26 that also wreaked havoc
>>> the smaller labels, so it wasn't just that. But the changeover to
>>> was a major contributing factor
>>> to the disappearance of certain labels in those years.
>>> Dave Lewis
>>> Lebanon, OH
>>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Dennis Rooney
>>> <[log in to unmask]>wrote:
>>>> Dear Tom,
>>>> No. Western Electric demonstrated their system to both Victor and
>>>> Each signed and began releasing electrical recordings by spring 1925.