LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  October 2012

ARSCLIST October 2012

Subject:

Re: Early electrical disk recording

From:

Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 8 Oct 2012 17:32:33 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (179 lines)

I did an ARSC presentation on this topic a number of years ago.

Check the Columbias for another, handwritten number in the dead wax with an
"X" prefix." These were Western Electric experiments that succeeded so well
that Columbia issued them.  I Think.  This wan't part of the presentation.

The companies had to "tamp down" the dynamic range, particularly in the
bass, so the records would sound OK on the earlier machines before the
speakers designed with the Orthophonic formulas, acoustic and electric, came
into general use. This allowed them to continue to sell records to their
installed base.  They let it all hang out in November of 1925 during
"Orthophonic Week." (again, the date is from memory).  These record releases
use the scroll label, whereas the eearlier 1925 electrics used the wing
label.    

The Western Electric test pressings of the New York Philharmonic, some of
which are dubbed in their commemorative CD box, clearly show greater dynamic
range than the commercial early electrics.  I used the Mengelberg Hollander
Overture to demo this. I'm going by memory here, but I think the
experimental one was made in 1924 and the commercial one in 1925.       

Incidntally, another of those experimental Western Electric discs in their
"X series stayed in print a while as a Victor frequency test record.  Can't
check for the number right now.  Again, it's handscribed in the dead wax and
bears a separate Victor catalog number as well.  

Steve Smolian
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Donald Tait
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 4:42 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Early electrical disk recording

  I might be incorrect about this, and would welcome being corrected, but I
have understood that the earliest commercially-released electrical recording
was from March 1925, live:

  US Columbia 50013-D (Black Label)
  Trad. arr. Mark Andrews: "John Peel"
  Associated Glee Clubs of America
    The label reads "850 Male Voices"
    "Recorded at their performance at Metropolitan Opera House, N.Y."
    Matrix #98163

  The other side:
  "Adeste Fidelis"
  Associated Glee Clubs, Met.Op. Hse.1925 (as above)
  850 Male Voices
  "Augmented by the audience of 4000 voices at the Metropolitan Opera House,
N.Y." Matrix 98166

  Nowhere do the labels indicate that a new or different recording method
was used.

  The astonishing listening experience is John Peel. The dynamic range is
incredible. The climax is extremely realistically loud. I've had at least
three copies over the years and have never found one without a degree of
wear in the climax, probably due to the heavy old pickups plowing through
the heavily modulated grooves and creating grooves of their own. 

  I have read that after wear tests on a few early electrical recordings,
the companies compressed their dynamic ranges to "cope." Is that correct?
John Peel would rather seem to demand it for 1925/6 pickups. And did Victor
beat Columbia with their Cortot and Stokowski electricals?

  Don Tait


 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
To: ARSCLIST <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Mon, Oct 8, 2012 3:00 pm
Subject: [ARSCLIST] Early electrical disk recording


This brings up a question -- what is the earliest commercially-released
electrically-recorded record?

Also, what is the oldest surviving test recording of an electrical system? 
Something from WECO? From
GE (the optical-film system)?

Is any of the pre-commercial electrically-recorded material online?

-- Tom Fine

----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Stamler" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 3:25 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Howard Scott Dies


> On 10/8/2012 11:36 AM, Mickey Clark wrote:
>> I have electrical issues on Columbia as early as January 1925- by Art
>> Gillham and  The Associated Glee Clubs of America waxed electrically by
>> March. I've issued discs by both these artists - Mickey
>
> And I transcribed a couple of Irish records, both by the same artist,
recorded 
a few weeks apart, 
> onw acoustic, one electric. Again, early 1925.
>
> But according to the information I've read, Western Electric first
approached 
Victor in late 1923 
> or early 1924, and Columbia shortly after. It took the two companies a
year 
(and a disastrous 
> Christmas sales season) to decide they would adopt the new system.
>
> Peace,
> Paul
>
>> Follow me on Twitter
>> https://twitter.com/MickeyRClark
>> M.C.Productions Vintage Recordings
>>     710 Westminster Ave. West
>>              Penticton BC
>>                 V2A 1K8
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Lewis" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 8:45 AM
>> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Howard Scott Dies
>>
>>
>>> In all due respect, while Victor and Columbia readily embraced electric
>>> recording, the smaller labels did resist, mainly as they didn't have the
>>> capital resources to make the switch.
>>> Brunswick had it's "light ray" process which, though a mystery, seems to
>>> have been used by others as well as a way to dodge the equipment upgrade
>>> and hefty licensing fees.
>>> Gennett's electrical system, such as it was, was terrible sounding at
>>> first. You would think that Marsh Labs, with its earlier, inferior
>>> electrical system, would have prospered as a
>>> result. But it didn't. Homer Rodeheaver closed his own acoustic studio
in
>>> Chicago in the fall of 1925 rather than to upgrade. I think BD&M went
>>> that
>>> route also.
>>>
>>> There was a little economic slump in 1925-26 that also wreaked havoc
>>> among
>>> the smaller labels, so it wasn't just that. But the changeover to
>>> electric
>>> was a major contributing factor
>>> to the disappearance of certain labels in those years.
>>>
>>> Dave Lewis
>>> Lebanon, OH
>>>
>>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Dennis Rooney
>>> <[log in to unmask]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear Tom,
>>>>
>>>> No. Western Electric demonstrated their system to both Victor and
>>>> Columbia.
>>>> Each signed and began releasing electrical recordings by spring 1925.
>>>>
>>>> DDR
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> 

 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager