LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


[email protected]


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  November 2012

ARSCLIST November 2012

Subject:

Re: New York Subways Radio Documentary

From:

Sam Brylawski <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 16 Nov 2012 13:40:17 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (173 lines)

While we're at this, know that the situation for WOR and other
broadcasting recordings is worse than you might imagine. U.S. law
considers broadcasts "unpublished." The exception to this is if they
were syndicated, i.e., distributed as transcriptions as opposed to
over the air. Of course this is hypothetical in WOR's case as no
pre-1972 recordings are covered by federal law. But if they were
protected under federal law the term would be 120 years from the date
of creation.

Good news/bad news: As I recall, when LC received the WOR collection
from GenCorp, in the Instrument of Gift GenCorp relinquished its own
rights to them. But at the same time, they attached strings to that. I
forget exactly what or how. But I think that they were saying, we're
generously donating rights, but that doesn't cover the rights of the
actors, musicians, writers, other union members, etc. WOR's original
contracts with those parties probably stated that they were being
compensated for their services *to a broadcast.* "After-market" was
not anticipated or covered in those contracts. See the Peggy Lee-"Lady
and the Tramp" lawsuit for an example of that issue.

Best wishes to the younger people on this list, those who will live to
2067 and be able to enjoy and study things like the WOR collection
legally.

Sam Brylawski

On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi James:
>
> I hear you loud and clear. I don't blame the LOC for the screwy copyright
> laws, and indeed many LOC employees are members of ARSC, which is actively
> lobbying to loosen the laws so citizens may have more widely-available
> access to the LOC's contents.
>
> I think you hear my frustrations clearly, as I hear yours.
>
>
> -- Tom Fine
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wolf, James L" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 11:52 AM
>
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] New York Subways Radio Documentary
>
>
> Tom,
>
> For better and for worse, copyright is not contingent on monetary value, nor
> upon the specific conditions of a work's creation.
>
> Like most everyone else in the archiving community, I agree that US
> copyright terms are ludicrous, especially on sound recordings - so I share
> your frustration. But I also have to sympathize with the LOC as an
> institution. As the administrator of copyright, it is completely bound to
> follow the law. I've commented before that its copyright functions put it at
> cross-purposes with its role as the nation's library. But until Congress
> splits off copyright and grants special dispensation to skirt the law, this
> is how things will be.
>
> James
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Tom Fine
> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 11:06 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] New York Subways Radio Documentary
>
> Well hopefully the BBC will put it online. I can't imagine it has one penny
> of monetary value, so this whole discussion of ownership and rights is
> ridiculous, it should be out in the public domain already (note that it
> would be in the UK). Plus, it wouldn't have been possible without access to
> the publicly-funded NYC subway system, which I believe operated at that time
> (and operates to this
> day) with a heavy subsidy from federal  taxes, hence partial ownership by
> every U.S. citizen.
>
> Yet another case of something the preservation and maintenance of which is
> funded by those who can't get any access to it (unless they live local to
> Washington DC and can take the time to wade through the LOC access rules and
> listen to it in person, which may well cost them extra money). Very
> frustrating!
>
> -- Tom Fine
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Wolf, James L" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 9:53 AM
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] New York Subways Radio Documentary
>
>
> LOC could not post this online without permission from rightsholders. The
> same would be necessary to
> obtain a private copy from LC. So that would be BBC, whoever now owns the
> rights to WOR, and
> possibly the heirs of Dick Willard.
>
> James
>
>
>
>
> Personal opinions only. Not a statement of official LC policy, etc.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> Tom Fine
> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 8:43 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] New York Subways Radio Documentary
>
> How does one get a copy of this recording? Can LOC post it online?
>
> -- Tom Fine
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Thom" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 8:13 AM
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] New York Subways Radio Documentary
>
>
>> A copy exists at the Library of Congress. See:
>> http://lccn.loc.gov/2002660082
>>
>> Thom Pease
>> Library of Congress
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Chris J Brady <[log in to unmask]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Have you tried
>>>
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Museum_of_Television_%26_Radio
>>>
>>> CJB
>>>
>> LC control no.: 2002660082
>> LCCN permalink: http://lccn.loc.gov/2002660082
>> Type of material: Nonmusic Sound Recording
>> Main title: New York subways [sound recording].
>> Published/Created: 1948.
>> Description: 2 sound discs : analog, 33 1/3 rpm ; 16 in.
>> Related names Willard, Dick.
>> WOR (Radio station : New York, N.Y.)
>> British Broadcasting Corporation.
>> Performer: WOR reporters: Dick Willard ... [et al.]
>> Credits: Presented by radio station WOR in cooperation with the BBC.
>> Summary: A radio documentary that examines the New York City subway
>> system. WOR reporters talk to various employees of the subway system
>> including a dispatcher, brakeman, signal maintenance man, staff member
>> of the lost and found, and a police officer. Includes a discussion of
>> the engineering system and its costs. Closes with an interview with a
>> nineteen-year-old female passenger, who was named Miss Subway of the
>> Month.
>> Subjects: Subways --New York (State) --New York.
>> Local transit --New York (State) --New York.
>> Form/Genre: Documentary radio programs.
>> Notes: Recorded Jan. 28, 1948, by WOR, New York, for broadcast in
>> Great Britain.
>> Additional formats: Preservation master. Washington, D.C. : Library
>> of Congress Magnetic Recording Laboratory, 1968. On 1 sound tape reel
>> : analog, 7 1/2 ips, 2 track, mono. ; 10 in.
>> LC classification: LWO 5520 r12A1-3 (preservation master)
>> CALL NUMBER: LWO 5520 r12 (preservation master)
>> -- Request in: Request in advance in Rec Sound Ref Center (Madison, LM113)
>> -- Status: Not Charged
>>
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager