LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for BIBFRAME Archives


BIBFRAME Archives

BIBFRAME Archives


BIBFRAME@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BIBFRAME Home

BIBFRAME Home

BIBFRAME  November 2012

BIBFRAME November 2012

Subject:

Re: "Each BIBFRAME Instance is an instance of one and,only one BIBFRAME Work"

From:

Eric Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative Forum <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 27 Nov 2012 16:41:45 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (69 lines)

Excellent. When I first thought about difficult use cases for testing BIBFRAME those dublincore pages were the first ones I looked at. Glad to know were on the same page ;)

--e


On Nov 27, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Diane Hillmann <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Eric:
> 
> As it happens I have a lot of examples, and they're even written up, though not specifically as formal 'use cases'. You may recall that in 2007 DCMI collaborated with JSC on the building of the RDA Vocabularies. There was quite a bit of good stuff gathered as part of that activity, which is now on the wiki of the successor group, the DCMI Bibliographic Metadata Task Group (http://wiki.dublincore.org/index.php/Bibliographic_Metadata_Task_Group#). At the bottom of that page is a like to the historical archives of the group.
> 
> The specific thing that I believe would help is a section called "Cataloger Scenarios":
> 
> http://wiki.dublincore.org/index.php/Cataloger_Scenarios
> 
> There are ten scenarios, contributed by a variety of people, and they generated a fair amount of discussion, most of which is still available through the JISC archives for the list (which is the same list as the original group used). As I'm sure you remember, catalogers inspired to supply examples contribute the knottiest things they know about, based on their experiences with the materials they catalog. So you'll note that there are a lot of special format scenarios.
> 
> Bon appetit!
> 
> Diane
> 
> P.S. BTW, one of the best things about RDA is the relationships, all of which have URIs: 
> http://metadataregistry.org/schema/show/id/13.html (relationships between Works Expressions Manifestations Items
> http://metadataregistry.org/schema/show/id/4.html (roles). These vocabularies have just over 750 properties, but some are complicated by the necessity of describing properties separately when they relate to different classes.
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Eric Miller <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi Diane, Philippe,
> 
> In this draft model, the aggregation would be done at the (BIBFRAME) Work level. A set of collected stories, for example, would in fact be a Collection (Work) of other Works. Works are typed and a Collection is just one kind of Work. What connects these Works together are a set of defined relationships that create a Web of Works. The paperback (or hardback, or …) version of this collected Work would be instances of this Collection (but there may be other instances associated with the individual Works as well).
> 
> Whats missing from this primer are more detailed use cases and example applications which help demonstrate more concretely this approach. I'm hopeful these will be made available soon. Nothing helps ground any model (and serialization, vocabulary, constraint layer, HTTP services, etc.) like practical examples.
> 
> Diane, as you know no good idea goes unpunished ;), if there are specific examples that you would be willing to suggest that would be extremely helpful. I can't claim a quick turn around, but I'd be happy to give a go at representing these via BIBFRAME.
> 
> --eric
> 
> On Nov 26, 2012, at 10:34 AM, Diane Hillmann <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> > Philippe:
> >
> > I had the same response, immediately thinking of things like collected stories (single or multiple authors) and serial issues. These are certainly fairly common in bibliographic metadata, and were not well handled in MARC or MODS. The FRBR model, though admittedly a complex beast, accommodated these materials, and gave some hope that there could be ways of handling those kinds of materials in ways that a machine could understand, rather than (as usual) depending on the human user to figure it out.
> >
> > Diane Hillmann
> >
> > Sent from my iPad
> >
> > On Nov 26, 2012, at 9:13 AM, "LE PAPE, Philippe" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> >> Dear Everybody,
> >>
> >> Colleagues have already expressed their concern about the vanishing of FRBR Expression entity in Zepheira's "BIBFRAME" model, but I was rather puzzled by this:
> >>
> >> "Each BIBFRAME Instance is an instance of one and,only one BIBFRAME Work." P. 10.
> >>
> >> What about (FRBR) Manifestations embodying more than one (FRBR) Work then? Will there be something like compound (BIBFRAME) instances? Or will the aggregation be done at the (BIBFRAME) Work level?
> >>
> >> Ph.
> >> --
> >>
> >> Philippe Le Pape
> >> Mission Normalisation
> >> 227 avenue Professeur-Jean-Louis-Viala
> >> 34193 MONTPELLIER CEDEX 5
> >> Tél.  33 (0)4 67 54 84 67
> >> Fax  33 (0)4 67 54 84 14
> 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
July 2011
June 2011

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager